Gipbsin v. Kernan, et al
Filing
304
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/7/2021 DISMISSING for lack of jurisdiction plaintiff's 303 motion to appoint counsel. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
No. 2:12-cv-0556 KJM DB P
ORDER
SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. Defendants’
16
17
summary judgment motion was granted, and judgment was entered on March 24, 2021. (ECF
18
Nos. 299, 300.) Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel
19
filed concurrently with a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 303.)
“The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance—it confers
20
21
jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects
22
of the case involved in the appeal.” Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58
23
(1982). Additionally, the filing of a notice of appeal divests a trial court of jurisdiction over the
24
matters appealed. Donovan v. Mazzola, 761 F.2d 1411, 1414 (9th Cir. 1985). Plaintiff indicates
25
that he is appealing both the grant of summary judgment and the denials of his requests for the
26
appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 301 at 1.) Because “a federal district court and a federal court
27
of appeals should not attempt to assert jurisdiction over a case simultaneously,” Griggs, 459 U.S.
28
////
1
1
at 58, the court will dismiss the motion to appoint counsel for lack of jurisdiction. Any renewed
2
motion for the appointment of counsel should be directed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF
4
No. 303) is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
5
Dated: April 7, 2021
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DB:12
DB:1/Orders/Prisoner/Civil.Rights/gipb0556.31(appeal)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?