Rushdan v. Hamkar et al

Filing 106

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/9/2015 ORDERING, within 30 days, the parties to inform this court's ADR divison, in writing, if they believe a settlement conference would be beneficial. (cc: ADR) (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

ROBERT STANLEY WOODS, a.k.a.
SALADIN RUSHDAN,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:12-cv-00562 MCE CKD P

ORDER
v.
HAMKAR, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19

This prisoner civil rights action was filed in March 2012 and proceeds on Eighth

20

Amendment claims against defendants Hamkar, Ali, and Nangalama. (ECF No. 105.) As this

21

case has been identified as potentially appropriate for referral to the court’s Alternative Dispute

22

Resolution program, the court will explore whether a settlement conference before a Magistrate

23

Judge would be beneficial.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. The parties shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, inform the court’s

26

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division, in writing, if they believe a settlement

27

conference would be beneficial, at the following address, fax number, or email

28
1

1

address:

2

ADR Division

3

Attention: Sujean Park

4

U.S. District Court

5

501 I Street, Suite 4-200

6

Sacramento, CA 95814

7

Fax: [phone]

8

Email: [e-mail]

9

Dated: November 9, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

2 / wood0562.sett

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2