Rushdan v. Hamkar et al

Filing 123

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/11/16 denying 118 Motion to enforce settlement agreement. Plaintiffs identical motion in No. 2:14-cv-0853 KJN 95 is denied. Plaintiffs identical motion in No. 1:14-cv-1807 DLB 26 is denied. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

ROBERT STANLEY WOODS aka
SALADIN RUSHDAN,
Plaintiff,

13

ORDER
v.

14
15

No. 2:12-cv-0562 MCE CKD P

HAMKAR, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On June 13, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement that

18
19

resolved this action and two other actions in a global agreement. (ECF No. 118; see ECF No.

20

112.) Plaintiff filed identical motions in the two other cases, Nos. 2:14-cv-0853 KJN and 1:14-

21

cv-1807 DLB. Following an informal conference call with the parties, defendants were ordered

22

to file a single response to plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 120.) Defendants filed their response on

23

July 21, 2016, and plaintiff filed his reply on August 8, 2016. (ECF Nos. 121 & 122.) Thus, the

24

motions in all three cases are submitted.
Having carefully considered the arguments and evidence, the undersigned will deny

25
26

plaintiff’s motion, effective in all three cases.

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

2

1. Plaintiff’s motion to enforce settlement agreement (ECF No. 118) is denied;

3

2. Plaintiff’s identical motion in No. 2:14-cv-0853 KJN (ECF No. 95) is denied; and

4

3. Plaintiff’s identical motion in No. 1:14-cv-1807 DLB (ECF No. 26) is denied.

5

Dated: August 11, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10

2 / rush0562.sett

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2