Baca v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 15

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/1/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TREDERIALO BACA,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:12-cv-0572 KJM DAD P

vs.
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al.,

14
Defendants.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

15
/
16
17

By order filed August 7, 2012, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and

18

he was granted leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty days. The thirty day

19

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded

20

to the court’s order.

21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

24

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

25

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

26

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
1

1

Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served

2

within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

3

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.

4

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

DATED: October 1, 2012.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

DAD:dpw
baca0572.fta

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2