Prasad et al v. County of Sutter et al

Filing 128

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/31/14 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #127 Stipulation and Proposed Order. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY PRASAD, et al., 12 No. 2:12-cv-0592 TLN CKD Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SUTTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 The parties have submitted a stipulation and proposed order regarding a potential 17 18 discovery dispute about the depositions of the minor plaintiffs. The proposed order would 19 effectively modify the scheduling order, which sets a discovery cut-off date of February 7, 2014. 20 ECF Nos. 36, 126. As such, the request must be directed to the District Judge assigned to this 21 action. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation and proposed order 23 (ECF No. 127) is denied without prejudice. 24 Dated: January 31, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 4 prasad.minor.stip

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?