Prasad et al v. County of Sutter et al
Filing
128
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/31/14 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #127 Stipulation and Proposed Order. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARY PRASAD, et al.,
12
No. 2:12-cv-0592 TLN CKD
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
ORDER
14
COUNTY OF SUTTER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
The parties have submitted a stipulation and proposed order regarding a potential
17
18
discovery dispute about the depositions of the minor plaintiffs. The proposed order would
19
effectively modify the scheduling order, which sets a discovery cut-off date of February 7, 2014.
20
ECF Nos. 36, 126. As such, the request must be directed to the District Judge assigned to this
21
action.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation and proposed order
23
(ECF No. 127) is denied without prejudice.
24
Dated: January 31, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
4 prasad.minor.stip
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?