Prasad et al v. County of Sutter et al

Filing 143

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs' Request to File documents under seal signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/16/14. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 2 KATHRYN G. MANTOAN – 239649 AARON J. FISCHER – 247391 3 JENNIFER L. STARK – 267062 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 4 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 5 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 Estate of NATHAN PRASAD, deceased, by and through MARY PRASAD; MARY PRASAD; T.P., 11 a minor; A.P., a minor; and N.S., a minor, Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 COUNTY OF SUTTER; J. PAUL PARKER, 14 Sutter County Sheriff’s Department Sheriff; DAVID SAMSON, Sutter County Jail Division BIDWELL, Sutter 15 Commander; NORMANLieutenant; LOU ANNE County Jail Corrections 16 CUMMINGS, Sutter County Health Officer; AMERJIT BHATTAL, Sutter County Assistant of Human Services – Health Division; 17 Director GARBETT, Sutter County Jail Nurse BRENT 18 Program Manager; DORIS BROWN, Sutter County Jail Advanced Registered Nurse 19 Practitioner; MELODY YOUNG, Sutter County Jail Licensed Vocational Nurse; KIMBERLY 20 WEISS, Sutter County Jail Licensed Vocational Nurse; GURKIRAT BHANGU, Sutter County 21 Jail Licensed Vocational Nurse; CHRISTINA STOHLMAN, Sutter County Jail Correctional 22 Officer; LESTER EATON, Sutter County Jail Correctional Officer; MIGUEL AGUILAR, Deputy Officer; OLGA 23 Sutter County Jail County Jail Deputy Officer; TAHARA, Sutter DIAZ, Sutter Jail Deputy Officer; 24 ROSACRAWFORD,CountyCounty Jail Deputy ERIC Sutter BALJINDER RAI, Sutter County Jail 25 Officer;Officer; SHANE DICKSON, Sutter Deputy Deputy Officer; FREMONT26 County Jail HEALTH GROUP; and MICHAEL RIDEOUT 27 FRATERS, D.O., Defendants. 28 Case No. 2:12-CV-00592-TLN-CKD ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 141 [1148920-3] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 141 1 2 ORDER On April 10, 2014, Plaintiffs, by and through plaintiff MARY PRASAD as Court- 3 appointed guardian ad litem for plaintiffs T.P., A.P., and N.S. (collectively, the “Minor 4 Plaintiffs”), submitted to the Court by email a Request to File Under Seal (“Request”) a 5 document entitled Confidential Declaration of Kathryn G. Mantoan in Support of 6 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Minors’ Compromise and for Orders to Deposit Money 7 Into Blocked Accounts (“Confidential Mantoan Declaration”). The Request, Confidential 8 Mantoan Declaration, and accompanying Proposed Order were served on all defendants in 9 this action by overnight mail on the same day, in compliance with Eastern District of 10 California Local Rule 141(b). 11 Having reviewed the Confidential Mantoan Declaration and its attached exhibit and 12 Plaintiffs’ request to file under seal, the Court finds that the documents at issue contain 13 sensitive, private, and personal information, the disclosure of which may prove unduly 14 burdensome and harmful to the Minor Plaintiffs. Further, the public’s interest in accessing 15 this information is minimal, as it is unrelated to the merits of the Minor Plaintiffs’ claims 16 or the underlying causes of action in this case. Therefore, given the balance of equities, 17 good case exists to maintain these documents under seal. 18 Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Request to File Under Seal the Confidential Declaration of 19 Kathryn G. Mantoan in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Minors’ 20 Compromise and for Orders to Deposit Money Into Blocked Accounts is GRANTED. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: April 16, 2014 24 25 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 26 27 28 ] 1 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 141

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?