Cooper v. Heatley et al
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/15/14 AFFIRMING the 2/25/14 order of the magistrate judge. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GOLDYN COOPER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-00602 KJM DAD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SCOTT HEATLEY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On April 3, 2014, plaintiff filed a document styled, "Notice And Opposition To The
18
Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd's February 25, 2014 Court Order . . ." which the court construes
19
as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed February 25, 2014, denying
20
plaintiff the appointment of counsel. Under Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall
21
be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the file, the court
22
finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
23
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
24
magistrate judge filed February 25, 2014, is affirmed.
25
DATED: May 15, 2014.
26
27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?