Turner v. Cates
Filing
14
ORDER adopting in full 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/16/12. Petitioner's 5 motion for temporary restraining order is denied. Petitioner's 6 motion for preliminary injunction is denied. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANTHONY R. TURNER,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Petitioner,
No. 2:12-cv-0609 JAM JFM (HC)
vs.
MATTHEW CATES,
Respondent.
ORDER
/
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On August 31, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and
24
recommendations was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s
25
responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local
26
Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
1
1
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
3
ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 31, 2012 are adopted in full;
5
2. Petitioner’s motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 5) is denied; and
6
3. Petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 6) is denied.
7
8
DATED: November 16, 2012
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?