Campbell v. River Terrace, L.P. et al
Filing
16
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/18/12: Initial disclosures shall be completed by 9/26/2012, all discovery shall be completed by 1/14/2013, designation of expert witnesses due by 1/14/2013, supplemental list of expert witnesses due by 1/28/2013, all expert discovery shall be completed by 2/28/2013, all dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 4/26 /2013. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 7/11/2013 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference statement by 6/20/2013. The Jury Trial is SET for 8/19/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. A Settlement Conference is SET for 10/15/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 26 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 JOYCE CAMPBELL,
NO. CIV. S-12-0646 KJM KJN
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
13 RIVER TERRACE, L.P., a California
Limited Partnership, et al.,
14
ORDER
Defendants.
15
____________________________________/
16
17
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on August 30, 2012;
18 Raymond Ballister appeared for plaintiff; Eileen Booth appeared for defendant. Having
19 reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on August 9, 2012, and discussed a schedule for
20 the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following orders:
21 I.
22
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted
23 without leave of court, good cause having been shown.
24 II.
25
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without
26 leave of court, good cause having been shown. See FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth
27 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
28 /////
1 III.
2
JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367(a). Jurisdiction and
3 venue are not disputed.
4 IV.
5
DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be
6 completed by September 26, 2012. All discovery shall be completed by January 14, 2013. In
7 this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all
8 depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by
9 appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed.
10 All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in
11 accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews
12 proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge
13 Mueller as discussed in more detail below.
14 V.
15
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all
16 other parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender
17 at trial not later than January 14, 2013. The designation shall be accompanied by a written
18 report prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P.
19 26(a)(2)(B). By January 28, 2013, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may
20 submit a supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered
21 by an expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness
22 designation has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental
23 designation shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the
24 conditions stated above.
25
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
26 likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
27 witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering
28 the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably
2
1 anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were
2 promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made
3 available for deposition.
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used
4
5 at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence,
6 which include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered
7 expert opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues
8 in the case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying
9 expert for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is
10 percipient, retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has
11 acquired the express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient
12 experts must state in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such
13 persons.
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
14
15 an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full
16 and complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be
17 permitted to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after
18 deposition taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by
19 February 28, 2013.
20 VI.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
21
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining
22 orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than April 26, 2013. The parties
23 may obtain available hearing dates by calling Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy, at (916)
24 930-4193.
25
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
26 230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also
27 apply:
28 /////
3
1
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
2
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
3
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding
4
the legal holiday.
5 Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
6 the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
7 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
8
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty
9 (20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases
10 must be made through the courtroom deputy clerk at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of
11 the motion.
12
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,
13 counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the
14 contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate
15 the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party
16 considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel
17 should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for
18 summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution
19 by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during
20 the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the
21 motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet
22 and confer efforts.
23
The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device
24 designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon
25 dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions
26 in limine. Although all motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial
27 statement, the court will hear only those motions it has identified to counsel before the hearing
28 date.
4
1
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
2 have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off
3 date may constitute waiver of such issue.
4 VII.
5
SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the
6 prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the
7 record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be
8 directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be
9 governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the
10 discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the
11 public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
12 sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party
13 has identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the
14 opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of
15 sealing or redaction from the court.
16 VIII. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
17
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for July 11, 2013, at 3:30 p.m. At least one
18 of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial
19 Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable
20 to attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with
21 the case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.
22
Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final
23 Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of
24 witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference
25 statement by June 20, 2013. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the
26 matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local
27 Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following:
28 /////
5
1
- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
2 tendered to the court and its resolution.
3
- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim.
4 Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not
5 to identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation
6 of each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered.
7 Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list
8 core disputed facts in the above manner.
9
- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s
10 motion in limine.
11
- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal issues of the trial
12 which will be discussed in the parties’ respective trial briefs. Points of law should reflect issues
13 derived from the core undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument or
14 authorities with any point of law.
15
- A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the
16 jury during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to
17 inform the jury what the case is about.
18
Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include
19 documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
20
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to
21 attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they
22 propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief
23 statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each
24 party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial
25 Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda
26 to the Final Pretrial Order.
27 /////
28 /////
6
1
Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be
2 listed alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court:
3 pink for plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits
4 shall be marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds "ZZ" exhibits
5 shall be then listed as A-3, A-4, A-5 etc. All multi page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise
6 fastened together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall
7 not include excerpts of depositions, which may be used to impeach witnesses. In the event that
8 plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to
9 by the designation the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to
10 this detail so that all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being
11 identified with both a number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning
12 exhibits and, to the extent possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and
13 listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2.
14
The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial
15 of witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that
16 the standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a
17 party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.
18
Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy,
19 no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.
20
Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds
21 for sanctions.
22
The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of
23 Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the
24 formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses;
25 (b) the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary
26 proof and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial
27 Conference Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these
28 /////
7
1 claims in mind.1 A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include
2 monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other
3 sanctions as the court deems appropriate.
Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement,
4
5 counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety
6 (including the witness and exhibit lists) to: kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
7 IX.
TRIAL SETTING
The jury trial is set for August 19, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial
8
9 length of approximately three to five days. Trial briefs are due by August 5, 2013.
10 X.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
11
The parties have expressed interest in appearing for settlement conference. Magistrate
12 Judge Carolyn K. Delaney has been randomly selected. A settlement conference is scheduled
13 before Judge Delaney for October15, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor.
The parties are directed to submit confidential settlement conference statements to
14
15 chambers seven (7) days prior to the settlement conference. Such statements are neither to be
16 filed with the clerk nor served on opposing counsel. However, each party shall e-file a one page
17 document entitled Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. The
18 parties may agree, or not, to serve each other with the settlement statements. Each party is
19 reminded of the requirement that it be represented in person at the settlement conference by a
20 person able to dispose of the case or fully authorized to settle the matter at the settlement
21 conference on any terms. See Local Rule 270.
22 XI.
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
23
24 Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
25 upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not
26
27
28
1
“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the
undisputed facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may
summarily dispose of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm.,
770 F.2d 866, 868-69 (9th Cir. 1985).
8
1 constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or
2 counsel does not constitute good cause.
3 XII.
4
OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
5 objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 DATED: September 18, 2012.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?