Reyes v. Smith et al
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/24/2013. Plaintiff's 24 Notice of Appeal is FRIVOLOUS and NOT taken in good faith. Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis status is appropriately REVOKED. Clerk directed to serve a copy of Order on Pro Se Unit at Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [cc: USCA - 9th Circuit] (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID REYES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-0652-KJM-CMK
v.
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to the court by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to
19
certify whether the appeal is taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
20
Having reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the appeal is not taken in
21
good faith. As stated in the court’s July 19, 2013, findings and recommendations, this action was
22
dismissed, without prejudice, for plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.
23
Specifically, plaintiff filed two inmate appeals, but neither was sufficient to exhaust his
24
administrative remedies before filing this action.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. This appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith;
27
2. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is appropriately revoked; and
28
///
1
1
2
3
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se
Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
DATED: December 24, 2013.
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?