Kevin Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER 19 to set Motion Hearing signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/29/2013. Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company to file it Motion for Summary Judgment so that Hearing will 10/3/2013. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MICHAEL L. WHITCOMB, ESQ. (SBN: 86744)
BRIAN W. PLUMMER, ESQ. (SBN: 240210)
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Law Department
10031 Foothills Boulevard, Suite 200
Roseville, CA 95747
General:
[phone]
Direct:
[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

KEVIN SMITH,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15

Case No.: 2:12-CV-00656-TLN-CKD

vs.

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO SET
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HEARING DATE

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,

16

Defendant.

17
18
19

Having reviewed the Stipulation submitted by the parties and the Status (PreTrial Scheduling) Order, the Court orders that:

20

1.

There is good cause for Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company to

21

file its Motion for Summary Judgment after the time limit prescribed in the Status

22

(Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order;

23
24

2.

Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company may file its Motion for

Summary Judgment so that the hearing on this motion will be October 3, 2013.

25

3.

All other Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will apply to the motion and

26

Plaintiff’s responsive documents.

27

///

28

///
-1____________________________________________________________________________________
Order Re: Stipulation to Set Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing Date

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 29, 2013

3
4
5
6

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2____________________________________________________________________________________
Order Re: Stipulation to Set Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing Date