Giraldes, Jr. v. Porter et al

Filing 80

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/07/15 ordering the court takes no action on plaintiff's filings as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LARRY GIRALDES, 11 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-662-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER K.M. PORTER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 After this civil rights case was closed pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of dismissal 17 following a settlement conference, see ECF No. 73, plaintiff sent the court two letters asking for 18 help obtaining financial records from 2006-2008.1 ECF Nos. 74, 75. On April 6, 2015, 19 defendants filed copies of the requested financial records. ECF No. 79. Plaintiff’s requests for 20 documents, thus, appear to be moot and the Clerk shall terminate docket entry number 74. 21 Regardless, the court takes no action on plaintiff’s filings as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is 22 hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not 23 authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 24 25 So ordered. Dated: May 7, 2015. 26 27 28 1 The court initially construed plaintiff’s filings as a motion to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement but upon further review, the filings instead appear to be a request for assistance in obtaining certain financial statements. See ECF No. 76.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?