Mendez v. Unknown
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/22/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
IVAN L. MENDEZ,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. 2:12-cv-0684 KJN P
Defendant.
ORDER
vs.
UNKNOWN,
14
15
/
16
Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28
17
U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed March 29, 2012, plaintiff’s was informed that in order to
18
commence an action, plaintiff must file a complaint and either pay the required filing fee or file
19
an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and was granted thirty days leave in which to do so.
20
The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise
21
responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is
22
dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
23
DATED: May 22, 2012
24
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
mend0684.fta
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?