Mendez v. Unknown

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/22/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IVAN L. MENDEZ, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-0684 KJN P Defendant. ORDER vs. UNKNOWN, 14 15 / 16 Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 17 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed March 29, 2012, plaintiff’s was informed that in order to 18 commence an action, plaintiff must file a complaint and either pay the required filing fee or file 19 an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and was granted thirty days leave in which to do so. 20 The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise 21 responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is 22 dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 DATED: May 22, 2012 24 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 mend0684.fta 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?