Jackson v. Hedepeth
Filing
38
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/25/14: Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED as MOOT 30 . (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ISSIAH W. JACKSON,
8
9
10
No. 2:12-cv-00691-TLN-CKD
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
ANTHONY HEDGPETH,
11
Respondent.
12
13
On June 2, 2014, this Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
14
Recommendations (ECF No. 28) in full, denying Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas
15
corpus and declining to issue a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on all issues under 28 U.S.C.
16
§ 2253. (ECF No. 30.) On November 10, 2014, Petitioner filed a Motion for Certificate of
17
Appealability (ECF No. 32), as well as a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals (ECF No. 33).
18
Under Ninth Circuit Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22-1(d), “[i]f the district court denies a
19
COA as to all issues, petitioner may file a motion for a COA in the court of appeals…. [i]f
20
petitioner does not file a COA motion … the court of appeals will deem the notice of appeal to
21
constitute a motion for a COA.” Because Petitioner filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court
22
of Appeals on November 10, 2014, his appeal is considered a motion for a COA with the Court of
23
Appeals and his motion before this Court is therefore moot. For these reasons, Petitioner’s
24
Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED as MOOT. (ECF No. 30.)
25
IT IS ORDERED.
26
Dated: November 25, 2014
27
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?