Jackson v. Hedepeth

Filing 38

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/25/14: Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED as MOOT 30 . (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ISSIAH W. JACKSON, 8 9 10 No. 2:12-cv-00691-TLN-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER ANTHONY HEDGPETH, 11 Respondent. 12 13 On June 2, 2014, this Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 14 Recommendations (ECF No. 28) in full, denying Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas 15 corpus and declining to issue a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on all issues under 28 U.S.C. 16 § 2253. (ECF No. 30.) On November 10, 2014, Petitioner filed a Motion for Certificate of 17 Appealability (ECF No. 32), as well as a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals (ECF No. 33). 18 Under Ninth Circuit Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22-1(d), “[i]f the district court denies a 19 COA as to all issues, petitioner may file a motion for a COA in the court of appeals…. [i]f 20 petitioner does not file a COA motion … the court of appeals will deem the notice of appeal to 21 constitute a motion for a COA.” Because Petitioner filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court 22 of Appeals on November 10, 2014, his appeal is considered a motion for a COA with the Court of 23 Appeals and his motion before this Court is therefore moot. For these reasons, Petitioner’s 24 Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED as MOOT. (ECF No. 30.) 25 IT IS ORDERED. 26 Dated: November 25, 2014 27 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?