Rosas v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Filing
6
MDL ORDER REMANDING Case to the Eastern District of California. CASE REOPENED(Benson, A.)
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. PELVIC
REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
FILED
Sep 09, 2020
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MDL No. 2326
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER
The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings in the action(s) on this conditional remand order have been completed and that remand
to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action(s) on this conditional remand order be remanded to
its/their respective transferor court(s).
IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal of this order to the transferee clerk for
filing shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with
the Clerk of the Panel within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the
Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United
States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for
the Southern District of West Virginia with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record
to be remanded.
FOR THE PANEL:
Sep 01, 2020
John W. Nichols
Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. PELVIC
REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2326
SCHEDULE FOR CRO
TRANSFEREE
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
WVS 2 14 17998
WVS 2 12 01006
WVS 2 15 02094
WVS 2 12 05179
WVS 2 18 00297
TRANSFEROR
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
ARW 5 14 05090
CAE 2 12 00701
LAE 2 15 00431
MSS 4 12 00136
TNW 1 18 02054
CASE CAPTION
Cline et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Rosas v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Richard v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Henry v. Boston Scientific et al
Rogers v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
IN RE:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.,
PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2326
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES
IDENTIFIED ON EXHIBIT A
ORDER AND SUGGESTION OF REMAND
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 and the Rules for Multidistrict Litigation promulgated
thereunder, specifically Rule 10.1(b), the court suggests that the cases on Exhibit A be remanded
to the United States District Courts from which they came, as identified on Exhibit A. The cases
were transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) and are related to MDL
2326 (“BSC MDL”), 2:12-md-2326, one of seven MDLs assigned to me by the JPML. The seven
MDLs combined totaled over 100,000 cases since inception.
Of the approximately 26,085 cases originally filed in or transferred to the BSC MDL, 158
remain. Of the remaining 158 cases, 5 are listed on Exhibit A and are ready to be remanded to the
jurisdictions from which they came. In particular, the time to conduct discovery is complete in the
cases on Exhibit A, and the parties have had time to file dispositive and Daubert motions,
responses and replies. For the convenience of the parties and in order to promote the final
resolution of these cases, it appears to the court that the cases would be more expeditiously
concluded in the venues from which they arise. Upon remand, I urge the receiving court to
immediately set these cases for trial without reopening discovery. Further discovery will only
result in unjust delay. Extensive development of these cases over a period of years has made
such further action completely unnecessary.
On or before August 28, 2020 (7 days from the date of this order), the parties are
ORDERED to confer and to file in their individual case, all documents from the main MDL that
the parties jointly deem relevant to constitute an appropriate record for the receiving court to
consider. When filing the documents from the main MDL, the parties are directed to use the
CM/ECF event entitled “Designation of Record for MDL Transfers” (available under Civil > Other
Filings > Other Documents). When completing the event, the “Main Document” should be the list
of joint designations from the main MDL, and the “Attachments” should be each individual
document on the joint designation list with the “Description” being the ECF number and a brief
description of the document (i.e. ECF 96 – Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment).
The court ORDERS that upon receipt and filing of an order to remand from the Clerk of
the JPML (hereinafter the “Transfer Date”), the Clerk of this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407,
shall remand the cases to the jurisdictions identified on Exhibit A. If the cases remain pending on
the Transfer Date, they must be remanded, and the parties shall bear the consequences in the
receiving court of any failure to prepare an appropriate record as directed in this order. The parties
and the receiving court are advised that all Pretrial Orders entered in this matter are available for
review on the court’s website at www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/MDL/boston/orders.html, and the master
docket sheet can be found on this court’s CM/ECF at 2:12-md-2326. Finally, the court advises the
parties that while the docket of these individual cases will be remanded to the receiving court, it
is the parties’ responsibility to follow the receiving court’s procedure for identifying any individual
motions that remain pending and in need of ruling.
2
On the Transfer Date, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to use the appropriate function in
CM/ECF to extract the cases on Exhibit A and remand them to the jurisdictions identified on
Exhibit A. After remand of the cases, the Clerk is DIRECTED to formally dismiss the cases and
strike them from the docket of this court.
The court further DIRECTS that a copy of this Order and Suggestion of Remand and
Exhibit A be filed in the cases on Exhibit A and sent to the Clerk of the MDL Panel and counsel
of record or any unrepresented party.
ENTER: August 21, 2020
3
EXHIBIT A
Remands
1
2
3
4
5
Civil Action
2:12-cv-01006
2:12-cv-05179
2:14-cv-17998
2:15-cv-02094
2:18-cv-00297
Case Style
Rosas v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Henry v. Boston Scientific et al
Cline et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Richard v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Rogers v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
Venue
Eastern District of California
Southern District of Mississippi
Western District of Arkansas
Eastern District of Louisiana
Western District of Tennessee
Tina Smith
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
JPMLCMECF@jpml.uscourts.gov
Tuesday, September 1, 2020 8:23 AM
JPMLCMDECF
Activity in Case MDL No. 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability
Litigation CRO Final Minute Order (Clerks)
Categories:
Order for Docketing
This is an automatic e‐mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e‐mail because
the mail box is unattended.
United States
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 9/1/2020 at 8:22 AM EDT and filed on 9/1/2020
Case Name:
IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
Case Number:
MDL No. 2326
Filer:
Document Number: No document attached
Docket Text:
***TEXT ONLY ENTRY***
MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Remand Order Finalized on 9/1/20.
Please see pleading (17 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 5 in CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 8 in LAE/2:15-cv00431, [2802] in MDL No. 2326, 5 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 8 in TNW/1:18-cv-02054).
A copy of the transferee court's Suggestion of Remand from the transferee court is attached
to the Conditional Remand Order.
As stipulated in Rule 10.2(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to
oppose the remand. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the
order is directed to you for filing.
The order was entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407(a) which provides that each action so
transferred by the Panel shall be remanded by the Panel at or before the conclusion of such
pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred. Parties are to furnish S.D.
West Virginia with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded
and all necessary copies of any pleading or other matter filed to comply with the remand
order.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
1
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15cv-00431, MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Rogers v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
Case Name:
Case Number:
TNW/1:18‐cv‐02054
Filer:
Document Number: No document attached
Docket Text:
***TEXT ONLY ENTRY***
MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Remand Order Finalized on 9/1/20.
Please see pleading (17 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 5 in CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 8 in LAE/2:15-cv00431, [2802] in MDL No. 2326, 5 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 8 in TNW/1:18-cv-02054).
A copy of the transferee court's Suggestion of Remand from the transferee court is attached
to the Conditional Remand Order.
As stipulated in Rule 10.2(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to
oppose the remand. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the
order is directed to you for filing.
The order was entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407(a) which provides that each action so
transferred by the Panel shall be remanded by the Panel at or before the conclusion of such
pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred. Parties are to furnish S.D.
West Virginia with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded
and all necessary copies of any pleading or other matter filed to comply with the remand
order.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Case Name:
Richard v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Number:
LAE/2:15‐cv‐00431
Filer:
Document Number: No document attached
Docket Text:
***TEXT ONLY ENTRY***
MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Remand Order Finalized on 9/1/20.
Please see pleading (17 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 5 in CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 8 in LAE/2:15-cv00431, [2802] in MDL No. 2326, 5 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 8 in TNW/1:18-cv-02054).
A copy of the transferee court's Suggestion of Remand from the transferee court is attached
to the Conditional Remand Order.
2
As stipulated in Rule 10.2(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to
oppose the remand. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the
order is directed to you for filing.
The order was entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407(a) which provides that each action so
transferred by the Panel shall be remanded by the Panel at or before the conclusion of such
pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred. Parties are to furnish S.D.
West Virginia with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded
and all necessary copies of any pleading or other matter filed to comply with the remand
order.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Case Name:
Henry v. Boston Scientific et al
Case Number:
MSS/4:12‐cv‐00136
Filer:
Document Number: No document attached
Docket Text:
***TEXT ONLY ENTRY***
MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Remand Order Finalized on 9/1/20.
Please see pleading (17 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 5 in CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 8 in LAE/2:15-cv00431, [2802] in MDL No. 2326, 5 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 8 in TNW/1:18-cv-02054).
A copy of the transferee court's Suggestion of Remand from the transferee court is attached
to the Conditional Remand Order.
As stipulated in Rule 10.2(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to
oppose the remand. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the
order is directed to you for filing.
The order was entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407(a) which provides that each action so
transferred by the Panel shall be remanded by the Panel at or before the conclusion of such
pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred. Parties are to furnish S.D.
West Virginia with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded
and all necessary copies of any pleading or other matter filed to comply with the remand
order.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Case Name:
Cline et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
3
Case Number:
ARW/5:14‐cv‐05090
Filer:
Document Number: No document attached
Docket Text:
***TEXT ONLY ENTRY***
MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Remand Order Finalized on 9/1/20.
Please see pleading (17 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 5 in CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 8 in LAE/2:15-cv00431, [2802] in MDL No. 2326, 5 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 8 in TNW/1:18-cv-02054).
A copy of the transferee court's Suggestion of Remand from the transferee court is attached
to the Conditional Remand Order.
As stipulated in Rule 10.2(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to
oppose the remand. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the
order is directed to you for filing.
The order was entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407(a) which provides that each action so
transferred by the Panel shall be remanded by the Panel at or before the conclusion of such
pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred. Parties are to furnish S.D.
West Virginia with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded
and all necessary copies of any pleading or other matter filed to comply with the remand
order.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Rosas v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Name:
Case Number:
CAE/2:12‐cv‐00701
Filer:
Document Number: No document attached
Docket Text:
***TEXT ONLY ENTRY***
MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Remand Order Finalized on 9/1/20.
Please see pleading (17 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 5 in CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 8 in LAE/2:15-cv00431, [2802] in MDL No. 2326, 5 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 8 in TNW/1:18-cv-02054).
A copy of the transferee court's Suggestion of Remand from the transferee court is attached
to the Conditional Remand Order.
As stipulated in Rule 10.2(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to
oppose the remand. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the
order is directed to you for filing.
4
The order was entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407(a) which provides that each action so
transferred by the Panel shall be remanded by the Panel at or before the conclusion of such
pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred. Parties are to furnish S.D.
West Virginia with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded
and all necessary copies of any pleading or other matter filed to comply with the remand
order.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
No public notice (electronic or otherwise) sent because the entry is private
5
Tina Smith
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
JPMLCMECF@jpml.uscourts.gov
Tuesday, September 1, 2020 8:21 AM
JPMLCMDECF
Activity in Case MDL No. 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability
Litigation
This is an automatic e‐mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e‐mail
because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and
parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if
receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges,
download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the
free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
United States
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 9/1/2020 at 8:20 AM EDT and filed on 9/1/2020
Case Name:
IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
Case Number:
MDL No. 2326
Filer:
Document Number: 2802
Docket Text:
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER FINALIZED (re: pldg. (15 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 3 in
CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 6 in LAE/2:15-cv-00431, [2800] in MDL No. 2326, 3 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 6
in TNW/1:18-cv-02054) ) - 5 action(s) - Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
(Attachments: # (1) Suggestion of Remand)
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Case Name:
Rogers v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
Case Number:
TNW/1:18‐cv‐02054
Filer:
Document Number: 8
Docket Text:
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER FINALIZED (re: pldg. (15 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 3 in
1
CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 6 in LAE/2:15-cv-00431, [2800] in MDL No. 2326, 3 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 6
in TNW/1:18-cv-02054) ) - 5 action(s) - Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
(Attachments: # [1] Suggestion of Remand)
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Richard v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Name:
LAE/2:15‐cv‐00431
Case Number:
Filer:
Document Number: 8
Docket Text:
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER FINALIZED (re: pldg. (15 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 3 in
CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 6 in LAE/2:15-cv-00431, [2800] in MDL No. 2326, 3 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 6
in TNW/1:18-cv-02054) ) - 5 action(s) - Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
(Attachments: # [1] Suggestion of Remand)
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Case Name:
Henry v. Boston Scientific et al
Case Number:
MSS/4:12‐cv‐00136
Filer:
Document Number: 5
Docket Text:
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER FINALIZED (re: pldg. (15 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 3 in
CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 6 in LAE/2:15-cv-00431, [2800] in MDL No. 2326, 3 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 6
in TNW/1:18-cv-02054) ) - 5 action(s) - Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
(Attachments: # [1] Suggestion of Remand)
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Case Name:
Case Number:
Filer:
Cline et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
ARW/5:14‐cv‐05090
2
Document Number: 17
Docket Text:
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER FINALIZED (re: pldg. (15 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 3 in
CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 6 in LAE/2:15-cv-00431, [2800] in MDL No. 2326, 3 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 6
in TNW/1:18-cv-02054) ) - 5 action(s) - Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
(Attachments: # [1] Suggestion of Remand)
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
Rosas v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Name:
CAE/2:12‐cv‐00701
Case Number:
Filer:
Document Number: 5
Docket Text:
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER FINALIZED (re: pldg. (15 in ARW/5:14-cv-05090, 3 in
CAE/2:12-cv-00701, 6 in LAE/2:15-cv-00431, [2800] in MDL No. 2326, 3 in MSS/4:12-cv-00136, 6
in TNW/1:18-cv-02054) ) - 5 action(s) - Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/1/2020.
(Attachments: # [1] Suggestion of Remand)
Associated Cases: MDL No. 2326, ARW/5:14-cv-05090, CAE/2:12-cv-00701, LAE/2:15-cv-00431,
MSS/4:12-cv-00136, TNW/1:18-cv-02054 (CMD)
MDL No. 2326 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Carl N Frankovitch carln@facslaw.com
Michael J. Farrell mjf@farrell3.com
Michael Bonasso mbonasso@fsblaw.com, etaylor@fsblaw.com, mdl@fsblaw.com, nthompson@fsblaw.com
Harry F Bell, Jr hfbell@belllaw.com
DAVID B. THOMAS dthomas@tcspllc.com, rdavis@tcspllc.com
Paul T. Farrell, Jr paul@farrell.law, lora@farrell.law
Marc E. Williams marc.williams@nelsonmullins.com
MDL No. 2326 Notice will not be electronically mailed to:
3
TNW/1:18‐cv‐02054 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Jon A. Strongman jstrongman@shb.com, Records‐BSC‐Mesh‐WSSUploads@shb.com, abyard@shb.com,
reickbush@shb.com
Michael A. Tanenbaum mtanenbaum@tktrial.com
Isaac T. Conner iconner@mansonjohnsonlaw.com
James H. Keale jkeale@tktrial.com
TNW/1:18‐cv‐02054 Notice will not be electronically mailed to:
LAE/2:15‐cv‐00431 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Michael Bonasso mbonasso@fsblaw.com, etaylor@fsblaw.com, mdl@fsblaw.com, nthompson@fsblaw.com
Jon A. Strongman jstrongman@shb.com, Records‐BSC‐Mesh‐WSSUploads@shb.com, abyard@shb.com,
reickbush@shb.com
Eric M. Anielak eanielak@shb.com
Charles Marshall Thomas charlie@huberslack.com
Michael A. Tanenbaum mtanenbaum@tktrial.com
James H. Keale jkeale@tktrial.com
Brian Patrick Marcelle bmarcelle@huberslack.com, brian@huberthomaslaw.com
LAE/2:15‐cv‐00431 Notice will not be electronically mailed to:
MSS/4:12‐cv‐00136 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Richard B. North, Jr richard.north@nelsonmullins.com, Andrew.Rosenzweig@nelsonmullins.com,
maria.turner@nelsonmullins.com, mark.nash@nelsonmullins.com, miche.boles@nelsonmullins.com
Christy D. Jones christy.jones@butlersnow.com, MDL200MotionFilings@butlersnow.com, MOMullan@RIKER.com,
ashley.lampkin@butlersnow.com, brandy.pitts@butlersnow.com, catherine.mason@butlersnow.com,
ecf.notices@butlersnow.com, kcrawford@riker.com, mkabbash@riker.com
Neville H. Boschert nboschert@joneswalker.com
Matthew D. Keenan mkeenan@shb.com
Barbara R. Binis bbinis@reedsmith.com, kmccloskey@reedsmith.com
Shane F Langston shane@langstonlawyers.com
Michael J. Farrell mjf@farrell3.com
4
Michael Bonasso mbonasso@fsblaw.com, etaylor@fsblaw.com, mdl@fsblaw.com, nthompson@fsblaw.com
William M. Gage william.gage@butlersnow.com, ashley.lampkin@butlersnow.com, brenda.jones@butlersnow.com,
brian.jackson@butlersnow.com, catherine.mason@butlersnow.com, david.johnson@butlersnow.com,
diane.wigley@butlersnow.com, ecf.notices@butlersnow.com, jackie.johnson@butlersnow.com
Erik W. Legg EWL@farrell3.com
DAVID B. THOMAS dthomas@tcspllc.com, rdavis@tcspllc.com
Jon A. Strongman jstrongman@shb.com, Records‐BSC‐Mesh‐WSSUploads@shb.com, abyard@shb.com,
reickbush@shb.com
Rebecca McRae Langston rebecca@langstonlawyers.com
Jason L. Nabors jason@naborslawfirm.com, jason@langstonlawyers.com
Philip J. Combs pcombs@tcspllc.com
Marc E. Williams marc.williams@nelsonmullins.com
Bryan T. Pratt bpratt@shb.com, bsmith@shb.com
Kari L. Sutherland kari.sutherland@butlersnow.com
Susan M. Robinson srobinson@tcspllc.com
James H. Keale jkeale@tktrial.com
Robert Thomas Adams rtadams@shb.com, janderson@shb.com
MSS/4:12‐cv‐00136 Notice will not be electronically mailed to:
ARW/5:14‐cv‐05090 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Kevin A. Crass crass@fridayfirm.com
Michael Bonasso mbonasso@fsblaw.com, etaylor@fsblaw.com, mdl@fsblaw.com, nthompson@fsblaw.com
Jon A. Strongman jstrongman@shb.com, Records‐BSC‐Mesh‐WSSUploads@shb.com, abyard@shb.com,
reickbush@shb.com
Michael A. Tanenbaum mtanenbaum@tktrial.com
Stephen Lance Cox lcox@coxfirm.com, chaddmason@aol.com, stephanie@coxfirm.com
G. Chadd Mason chaddmason@aol.com
Aimee Wagstaff aimee.wagstaff@andruswagstaff.com
James H. Keale jkeale@tktrial.com
5
ARW/5:14‐cv‐05090 Notice will not be electronically mailed to:
CAE/2:12‐cv‐00701 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Christy D. Jones christy.jones@butlersnow.com, MDL200MotionFilings@butlersnow.com, MOMullan@RIKER.com,
ashley.lampkin@butlersnow.com, brandy.pitts@butlersnow.com, catherine.mason@butlersnow.com,
ecf.notices@butlersnow.com, kcrawford@riker.com, mkabbash@riker.com
William M. Gage william.gage@butlersnow.com, ashley.lampkin@butlersnow.com, brenda.jones@butlersnow.com,
brian.jackson@butlersnow.com, catherine.mason@butlersnow.com, david.johnson@butlersnow.com,
diane.wigley@butlersnow.com, ecf.notices@butlersnow.com, jackie.johnson@butlersnow.com
Eric H. Gibbs ehg@classlawgroup.com, 9141823420@filings.docketbird.com, ecf@classlawgroup.com
DAVID B. THOMAS dthomas@tcspllc.com, rdavis@tcspllc.com
Jon A. Strongman jstrongman@shb.com, Records‐BSC‐Mesh‐WSSUploads@shb.com, abyard@shb.com,
reickbush@shb.com
Philip J. Combs pcombs@tcspllc.com
Geoffrey A Munroe gam@classlawgroup.com
Kari L. Sutherland kari.sutherland@butlersnow.com
Susan M. Robinson srobinson@tcspllc.com
Caroline Dye Walker caroline.walker@butlersnow.com
CAE/2:12‐cv‐00701 Notice will not be electronically mailed to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document
Original filename:n/a
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP JPMLStamp_ID=1090522767 [Date=9/1/2020] [FileNumber=1010767‐0]
[6cdb11d5aab4f6f35f48d273a2c12025a2803945accbee3143339da104c05a2176445
841654f8dfab7334b4f766cec2b56d33366f74ba01afdcb5078d93dbedc]]
Document description: Suggestion of Remand
Original filename:n/a
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP JPMLStamp_ID=1090522767 [Date=9/1/2020] [FileNumber=1010767‐1]
[ae734a09d1cf0eb4d8462df7946dbb4509f4ff71f633b7ab37fe96bba85c27bb9e96b
3dab313dd3e84fed3d69b87fc0db987a3bf766f10692e46efaef7d318a6]]
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?