United States of America v. Real property located at 149 G Street, Lincoln, California, Placer County, APN: 008-266-015-000 et al

Filing 108

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/20/13 ORDERING the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the defendant Antelope Property. And, based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem filed 3/20/12, and the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice filed herewith, it is further ORDERED that this Court enters a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for: (1) the posting of the d efendant Antelope Property located at 7447 Antelope Road, Citrus Heights, CA, Sacramento County, APN: 204-0202-014-0000, and (2) the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action against the defendant Antelope Property. IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D that the United States shall withdraw its Notice of Lis Pendens recorded against defendant Antelope Property, and the United States shall execute and record such documents as are reasonably necessary to remove the cloud on title caused by the recording of the Lis Pendens against defendant Antelope Property within seven days after the date of entry of this Order. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U. S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 5 6 Attorneys for the United States 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 149 G STREET, LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA, PLACER COUNTY, APN: 008-266-015-000, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, et al., 2:12-CV-00705-TLN-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7447 ANTELOPE ROAD, CITRUS HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA; CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE Defendants. 18 19 It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimants 20 Standard Insurance Company, Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Liberty Mutual Fire 21 Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Peerless Insurance Company 22 (hereinafter collectively, the "Standard Lienholders") and Volen Properties 8, LLC, by and through 23 their respective counsel of record (the “Stipulation”), as follows: 24 1. The real property located at 7447 Antelope Road, Citrus Heights, California, 25 Sacramento County, APN: 204-0202-014-0000 (“Antelope Property”) is a named defendant in the 26 above entitled action. 27 28 2. The only parties who have filed claims to the Antelope Property are the Standard Lienholders and Volen Properties 8, LLC, through its manager Bart Volen. Stipulation and Order for Dismissal 1 2 3. The parties to this Stipulation agree that defendant Antelope Property shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 4. Each of the parties to this Stipulation shall bear their own attorneys fees and 4 costs that were incurred with respect to the commencement, prosecution and defense of this 5 litigation that were specifically applicable to the Antelope Property. 6 5. For purposes of effectuating this stipulation and dismissal, the parties do not 7 contest there was probable cause for the posting of the defendant Antelope Property, and for the 8 commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action against the defendant Antelope Property, 9 and further agree that the Court may enter a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 10 § 2465, with respect to the defendant Antelope Property only. 11 6. The United States shall withdraw its Notice of Lis Pendens recorded against 12 defendant Antelope Property, and the United States shall execute and record such documents as are 13 reasonably necessary to remove the cloud on title caused by the recording of the Lis Pendens 14 against defendant Antelope Property within seven days after the date of entry of this Order. 15 16 7. This Stipulation applies only to the defendant Antelope Property and does not apply to any other defendant properties. 17 18 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Dated: 8/20/13 19 By: 20 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 21 22 Dated: 8/19/13 /s/ Barry L. Groce _____ BARRY L. GROCE Attorney for Standard Lienholders 23 24 25 Dated: 8/12/13 /s/ Courtney J. Linn____ COURTNEY J. LINN Attorney for Volen Properties 8, LLC 26 27 Signatures authorized by email 28 LA 9438619v1 -2- Stipulation and Order for Dismissal 1 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST DEFENDANT ANTELOPE 2 PROPERTY AND CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE 3 It is hereby ORDERED: 4 The Stipulation is approved in its entirety. 5 The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the defendant Antelope Property. 6 And, based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem filed 7 March 20, 2012, and the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice filed herewith, it is further 8 ORDERED that this Court enters a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 9 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for: (1) the posting of the defendant Antelope 10 Property located at 7447 Antelope Road, Citrus Heights, California, Sacramento County, APN: 11 204-0202-014-0000, and (2) the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action against the 12 defendant Antelope Property. 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall withdraw its Notice of 14 Lis Pendens recorded against defendant Antelope Property, and the United States shall execute and 15 record such documents as are reasonably necessary to remove the cloud on title caused by the 16 recording of the Lis Pendens against defendant Antelope Property within seven days after the date 17 of entry of this Order. 18 19 DATED: August 20, 2013 20 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA 9438619v1 -3- Stipulation and Order for Dismissal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?