Chestang v. Swarthough

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/2/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED for the reasons set forth in the 4/23/12, order and for failure to follow court instructions to file an amended petition. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL K. CHESTANG, 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 No. 2:12-cv-0737 GGH P SWARTHOUT, 13 Respondent. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of 16 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 17 petitioner’s consent. Doc. 4. On April 23, 2012, the petition was dismissed with leave to amend 18 within 28 days, as the petition failed to set forth a cognizable claim. However, that time limit has 19 passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise communicated with the 20 court. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for the 22 reasons set forth in the April 23, 2012, order and for failure to follow court instructions to file an 23 amended petition. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 DATED: July 2, 2012 25 26 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GGH: AB - ches0737.fta 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?