White v. Hill
Filing
13
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/14/12. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DIWON WHITE,
Petitioner,
12
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-0748 LKK EFB P
Respondent.
11
ORDER
vs.
RICK HILL,
/
15
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
17
28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no
18
absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d
19
453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings “if the
20
interests of justice so require.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing
21
§ 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the
22
appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.
23
Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel
24
(Dckt. No. 12) is denied without prejudice.
25
Dated: November 14, 2012.
26
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?