Hittle v. City of Stockton et al

Filing 97

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/17/21 ORDERING that Defendants shall file and serve their motion for summary judgment on or before 2/18/21, setting the hearing date for 4/1/21. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the summary judgment motion on 3/11/21 and Defendants shall file their reply on 3/25/21. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Wendy E. Musell (SBN: 203507)
LAW OFFICES OF WENDY MUSELL
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail].
Alan J. Reinach, SBN 196899
Jonathon Cherne, SBN 281548
CHURCH STATE COUNCIL
2686 Townsgate Road
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

9

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ronald Hittle
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

RONALD HITTLE,

14
15
16
17
18

Case No. 2-12-CV-00766-TLN-KJN

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
ENLARGE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION

vs.
THE CITY OF STOCKTON, ROBERT
DEIS, LAURIE MONTES, and DOES 1100, inclusive,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23

Whereas, this matter involves six (6) causes of action, and twenty-four (24) affirmative
defenses; and
Whereas, discovery herein has produced several thousands of pages of documents; and
Whereas the complexity of the issues herein has already resulted in Defendants seeking,

24

and this Court granting to Defendants an enlargement from twenty (20) to twenty-five (25) the
25
26
27

page limitation for its summary judgment motion, and a similar page limitation for Plaintiff’s
opposition; [ECF-95] and

28

1

Whereas Plaintiff has requested additional time to properly brief the issues in this case
1
2

and Defendants agree that additional time is appropriate, albeit less time than the four (4) weeks

3

requested by Plaintiff;

4

It is hereby stipulated and agreed:

5

1.

6

Defendants will file and serve their motion for summary judgment on or before

February 18, 2021, setting the hearing date for April 1, 2021;

7

2.

Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the summary judgment motion on March 11,

8

2021;
9
10

3.

Defendants will file their reply in support of the motion on March 25, 2021;

11

4.

The parties further agree that with respect to the motion for summary judgment

12

Plaintiff intends to file; Defendants shall have three (3) weeks to file their opposition to the

13

summary judgment motion and Plaintiff shall have two (2) weeks to file his reply.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: February 15, 2021

LAW OFFICE OF WENDY MUSELL
CHURCH STATE COUNCIL

2
3

By: s/ Alan J Reinach
ALAN J. REINACH
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RON HITTLE

4
5
6
7

Dated: February 17, 2021

RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP

8
9

By: s/ Geoff Spellberg
GEOFF SPELLBERG
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF STOCKTON et al.

10
11
12
13

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED:
14
15

DATED: February 17, 2021

16
17

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3