In Re: SK Foods, LP
Filing
18
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/1/12 ORDERING that the case denominated Civ No. 12-923 is REASSIGNED to Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton for all further proceedings. The caption on documents filed in the REASSIGNED case shall be shown as 2:12-cv-923 LKK. The Clerk shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
CR. NO. S-10-061 LKK
FREDERICK SCOTT SALYER,
14
Defendant.
/
15
IN RE:
16
SK FOOD, L.P.,
17
Debtor.
18
BRADLEY D. SHARP, Chapter 11
Trustee,
19
Plaintiff,
CIV NO. S-12-775 LKK
20
v.
21
SSC FARMS 1, LLC, et al.,
22
Defendants.
23
/
24
////
25
////
26
////
1
IN RE:
2
SK FOODS, L.P.,
3
Debtor.
4
BRADLEY D. SHARP, Chapter 11
Trustee,
5
Plaintiff,
CIV. NO. S-12-923 GEB
6
v.
7
SSC FARMS 1, LLC, et al.,
RELATED CASE ORDER
8
Defendants.
9
/
10
The court is in receipt of a notice that Sharp v. SSC Farms
11
I, LLC (In re SK Foods, L.P.), Civ. No. 12-923 GEB, is related to
12
Sharp v. SSC Farms I, LLC (In re SK Foods, L.P.), Civ. No. 12-775
13
LKK. Examination of the cases shows that they are related, as they
14
are both appeals from the same Bankruptcy Court orders.
15
to E.D. Cal. R. 123(c), related cases are re-assigned to the judge
16
with the lower numbered case.
17
Accordingly the court ORDERS as follows:
18
1.
Pursuant
The case denominated Civ. No. 12-923 GEB is REASSIGNED
19
to Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton for all further proceedings.
20
Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case
21
shall be shown as Civ. No. 12-923 LKK.
2.
22
the
The Clerk of the Court make shall appropriate adjustment
23
in
assignment of civil cases to compensate for this
24
reassignment.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED:
May 1, 2012.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?