Thompson v. Rosario, et al
Filing
3
ORDER Transferring Case To The Sacramento Division Of The Eastern District Of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 3/26/2012. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MARIO THOMPSON,
10
1:12-cv-00441-GBC (PC)
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
D. ROSARIO, et al,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
17
In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations by defendants at California State Prison, Solano. The
18
alleged violations took place in Sacramento County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the
19
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have
20
been filed in the Sacramento Division.
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper court
22
may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action will be
23
transferred to the Sacramento Division. This court will not rule on plaintiff’s request to proceed in
24
forma pauperis.
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
Page 1 of 2
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
3
California sitting in Sacramento; and
4
5
2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
6
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
7
8
9
3. This court has not ruled on plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
7j8cce
March 26, 2012
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?