Federal Trade Commission v. Hope for Car Owners, LLC et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/28/2012 re 2 Notice of Related Case filed by Federal Trade Commission ORDERING that the actions involve different defendants and would involve different factual issues; therefore, the undersigned judge DECLINES to relate the actions. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
11
HOPE FOR CAR OWNERS, LLC; and
PATRICK FREEMAN,
12
Defendants.
________________________________
13
14
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
v.
NAFSO VLM, INC.; KORE SERVICES,
LLC; NAYTHEM NAFSO; and MICHAEL
KAMFIROOZIE,
Defendants.
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:12-cv-00778-GEB-EFB
RELATED CASE ORDER
2:12-cv-00781-KJM-EFB
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Related Cases” on March 27, 2012,
in which it states:
[T]he instant case is related to the following
case, FTC v. NAFSO VLM, Inc., et al., Case No.
2:12-at-00393, that has also been filed in the
Eastern
District
of
California,
Sacramento
Division. The grounds for noticing these cases as
related cases is as follows: both actions involve
similar questions of fact and the same question of
law and their assignment to the same Judge or
Magistrate Judge is likely to effect a substantial
savings of judicial effort, either because the same
result should follow in both actions or otherwise.
1
1
(ECF No. 2.) However, examination of the above-entitled actions does not
2
indicate that their “assignment . . . to a single Judge is likely to
3
effect a savings of judicial effort or economies[.]” E.D. Cal. R.
4
123(c). While similar preliminary questions of law may exist, the
5
actions involve different defendants and would involve different factual
6
issues. Therefore, the undersigned judge declines to relate the actions.
7
Dated:
March 28, 2012
8
9
10
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?