Johnson v. Nguyen et al

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/22/12: Defendants are granted an extension until June 1, 2012 to respond or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
4 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson 6 CRIS C. VAUGHAN, ESQ., SBN 99568 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES 6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800 Loomis, CA 95650 Telephone: 916-660-9401 Facsimile: 916-660-9378 1 2 3 7 8 9 Attorney for Defendants, Chua Van Nguyen and Kim Anh Nguyen 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 Scott N. Johnson 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Chua Van Nguyen; Kim Anh ) Nguyen, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) Case No.2:12-cv-00784-LKK-KJN STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL JUNE 1, 2012 FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson and Defendants, Chua Van Nguyen and Kim Anh Nguyen, 23 stipulate as follows: 24 25 26 1. No extension of time has been obtained. 27 28 STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 previously 2. Defendants are granted an extension until June 1 2 1, 3 Plaintiff’s complaint. 4 2012 to respond or otherwise plead to 3. Defendants’ response will be due no later than 5 June 1, 2012. 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of May 18, 2012. 8 9 Dated: May 18,2012 _/s/ Cris C. Vaughan__ Cris C. Vaughan, Attorney for Defendants, California Red’s Café, Inc.; Dorothy M. Boone and James K. Boone Dated: May 18, 2012 _/s/ Scott N. Johnson________ Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: May 22, 2012. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?