Johnson v. Nguyen et al
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/22/12: Defendants are granted an extension until June 1, 2012 to respond or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint. (Kaminski, H)
4
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516
FAX (916) 481-4224
E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net
5
Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
6
CRIS C. VAUGHAN, ESQ., SBN 99568
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800
Loomis, CA 95650
Telephone: 916-660-9401
Facsimile: 916-660-9378
1
2
3
7
8
9
Attorney for Defendants, Chua Van Nguyen and Kim Anh Nguyen
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
Scott N. Johnson
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Chua Van Nguyen; Kim Anh
)
Nguyen,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
Case No.2:12-cv-00784-LKK-KJN
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF
TIME UNTIL JUNE 1, 2012 FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND ORDER
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N.
Johnson and Defendants, Chua Van Nguyen and Kim Anh Nguyen,
23
stipulate as follows:
24
25
26
1. No
extension
of
time
has
been
obtained.
27
28
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
previously
2. Defendants are granted an extension until June
1
2
1,
3
Plaintiff’s complaint.
4
2012
to
respond
or
otherwise
plead
to
3. Defendants’ response will be due no later than
5
June 1, 2012.
6
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of May 18, 2012.
8
9
Dated:
May 18,2012
_/s/ Cris C. Vaughan__
Cris C. Vaughan,
Attorney for Defendants,
California Red’s Café,
Inc.; Dorothy M. Boone
and James K. Boone
Dated:
May 18, 2012
_/s/ Scott N. Johnson________
Scott N. Johnson,
Attorney for Plaintiff
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated:
May 22, 2012.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?