Spohn v. Craig et al
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/12/12 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
PAUL NOAH SPOHN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-0796 JAM DAD P
vs.
NUMEROUS TRINITY COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT
DEPUTY’S, etc.,
15
Defendants.
16
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/
17
By order filed September 27, 2012, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty
18
days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now
19
passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s
20
order.
21
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
23
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
24
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-
25
one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
26
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
1
1
Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
2
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
3
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
DATED: November 12, 2012.
5
6
7
8
9
DAD:12
spoh0796.fta
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?