United States of America v. Real property located at 705 through 709 South California Street, Stockton, California, San Joaquin County, APN: 149-084-06

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER 26 for Stay signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/5/2012. This matter is STAYED until 12/6/2012. On or before 12/6/2012, parties will advise Court whether further Stay is appropriate. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916)554-2700 5 Attorneys for the United States 2 3 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 2:12-CV-00811-JAM-EFB STIPULATION TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER v. 17 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 705 THROUGH 709 SOUTH CALIFORNIA STREET, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, APN: 149084-06, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, 18 Defendant. 15 16 19 20 The United States of America and claimants Sam Luigi Toccoli, Lisa Toccoli 21 Stenard and Albert Toccoli, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate 22 that a stay is appropriate in the above-entitled action, and request that the Court enter 23 an order staying further proceedings until December 6, 2012. The basis for the 24 proposed stay is the related criminal action against two individuals charged with 25 cultivating marijuana at the defendant property, United States v. Brandon Conley, 26 2:12-CR-00077-JAM, and the ongoing criminal investigation into marijuana cultivation 27 at the defendant property. 28 1. The Beverly J. Toccoli Marital Deduction Trust U/A/D 8/11/99 is record 1 Stipulation to Stay Further Proceedings and Order 1 owner of a one-half undivided seventh-eighths interest. The S.L. Toccoli Survivor 2 Trust U/A/D 8/11/99 is the record owner of a one-half undivided seventh-eighths 3 interest. Allyal Properties, a California General Partnership, is the record owner of an 4 undivided one-eighth interest. Each of the claimants has filed a claim to the defendant 5 property based on various interests connected to the above-identified trusts and/or 6 business entities. 7 2. The stay is requested pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1), 981(g)(2), and 21 8 U.S.C. § 881(i). 9 3. To date, two individuals have been charged with federal criminal crimes 10 related to marijuana cultivation at the defendant property, United States v. Brandon 11 Conley, 2:12-CR-00077-JAM. (None of the claimants have been charged with any 12 criminal offense by state, local, or federal authorities.) It is the United States' position 13 that the statute of limitations has not expired on potential criminal charges relating to 14 the marijuana grow at the defendant property. The United States intends to depose 15 those charged with crimes connected to the marijuana grow at the defendant property 16 regarding their knowledge and/or participation in the large scale marijuana cultivation 17 and property ownership. If discovery proceeds at this time, these individuals, or some 18 of them, will be placed in the difficult position of either invoking their Fifth 19 Amendment rights against self-incrimination or waiving their Fifth Amendment rights 20 and submitting to a deposition and potentially incriminating themselves (at least one 21 individual prior to a criminal trial). If they invoke their Fifth Amendment rights, the 22 United States will be deprived of the ability to explore the factual basis for the claims 23 they filed with this court. 24 4. In addition, claimants intend to depose, among others, the agents 25 involved with this investigation, including but not limited to the agents with the Drug 26 Enforcement Administration and the Internal Revenue Service. Allowing depositions 27 of the law enforcement officers at this time would adversely affect the ability of the 28 federal authorities to prepare for the criminal trial and/or further investigate the 2 Stipulation to Stay Further Proceedings and Order 1 2 alleged underlying criminal conduct.1 5. The parties recognize that proceeding with these actions at this time 3 could have potential adverse effects on the investigation of the underlying criminal 4 conduct and/or upon the claimants' ability to prove their claim to the property and to 5 assert any defenses to forfeiture. For these reasons, the parties jointly request that 6 these matters be stayed until December 6, 2012, in accordance with the terms of this 7 stipulation. At that time the parties will advise the court of the status of the criminal 8 investigation and will advise the court whether a further stay is appropriate.2 9 Dated: 11/2/12 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 10 11 By: 12 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 13 Dated: 11/2/12 /s/ Kenneth C. Mennemeier, Jr. KENNETH C. MENNEMEIER, JR. Attorney for claimants (Authorized by email) 14 15 16 17 ORDER For the reasons set forth above, this matter is stayed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 18 981(g)(1), 981(g)(2), and 21 U.S.C. § 881(i) until December 6, 2012. On or before 19 December 6, 2012, the parties will advise the court whether a further stay is 20 appropriate. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/5/2012 /s/ John A. Mendez JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Claimants have issued written discovery to the United States concerning the marijuana evidence used to support the forfeiture complaint. The United States has obtained an extension until September 28, 2012. Any discovery obligations are stayed in light of this Stipulation. The claimants reserve the right to summarily adjudicate the issues relative to their interest in the defendant property once the stay has been lifted and discovery completed. 2 The parties filed a joint status report in the case on July 25, 2012. ECF No. 14. The parties will file an amended joint status report once the stay is lifted. 3 Stipulation to Stay Further Proceedings and Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?