Zarco v. Shredfast Mobile Data Destruction, Inc.
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/27/13. A dispositional document shall be filed no later than 10/17/2013. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARIO ALBERTO ZARCO,
VECOPLAN, LLC, and TOTER,
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND
Defendant Vecoplan, LLC filed an “Immediate Notice of
Settlement/Resolution of Entire Case” on September 26, 2013, in
which it states
dispute/litigation . . . reached an agreement
settling/resolving this matter while present
at a private mediation session held in
Sacramento, California. As such, and in
accordance with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it has been
agreed that Plaintiff’s counsel of record
conformance with any filing deadline(s)/due
date(s) that may be ordered by the Court
subsequent to the filing and service of this
Notice, submit to this Court for approval and
filing a Stipulation of Dismissal executed
by/on behalf of all of the parties to this
case . . . .
(Notice of Settlement 1:20-28, ECF No. 30.)
Therefore, a dispositional document shall be filed no
later than October 17, 2013. See E.D. Cal. R. 160(b) (prescribing
that documents disposing of an action shall be filed “not . . .
deadline may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action
without prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. See id.
(“A failure to file dispositional papers on the date prescribed
by the Court may be grounds for sanctions.”).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 27, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?