Federal Trade Commission v. Broadway Global Master Inc. et al

Filing 65

STIPULATION and ORDER 64 extending stay signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/2014. Given pending issues with criminal case, and in order to allow Mr. Patel and the FTC to try and reach a resolution of civil matter, Mr. Patel and counsel for FTC b elieve it necessary to EXTEND the stay for additional 120 days. Mr. Patel agrees that, during pendency of stay, he will NOT seek release of assets frozen pursuant to Preliminary Injunction. The requested stay is a stay of entire civil action against all defendants including a stay of pending Motion for Default Judgment against defendants Broadway Global Master Inc. and In-Arabia Solutions Inc.. The stay does not alter the Preliminary Injunction with asset freeze, which will remain in full effect. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 5 Mark E. Ellis - 127159 Andrew M. Steinheimer - 200524 ELLIS LAW GROUP, LLP 740 University Avenue, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Tel: (916) 283-8820 Fax: (916) 283-8821 mellis@ellislawgrp.com asteinheimer@ellislawgrp.com 6 Attorneys for Defendant KIRIT PATEL 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:12-cv-0855 JAM DAD v. STIPULATION TO EXTEND STAY; AND ORDER BROADWAY GLOBAL MASTER INC., a corporation, also d/b/a BGM, IN-ARABIA SOLUTIONS INC., a corporation, and KIRIT PATEL, individually and as an officer of BROADWAY GLOBAL MASTER INC., and IN-ARABIA SOLUTIONS INC. Defendants. 20 21 STIPULATION 22 On August 23, 2012, defendant Kirit Patel was indicted by the United States on criminal 23 charges related to the same subject matter as the instant case (see Case No. 2:12-CR-00306-JAM). On 24 September 12, 2012, the Court entered a stipulation between Mr. Patel and counsel for the Federal 25 Trade Commission (“FTC”) staying this matter for six months or until the resolution of the criminal 26 case, whichever is shorter. The parties continued the stay for an additional four months on March 8, 27 2013, an additional 90 days on July 8, 2013, an additional 90 days on November 8, 2013, an additional 28 90 days on February 7, 2014, an additional 90 days on April 29, 2014 and an additional 120 days on -1______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO EXTEND STAY; AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 August 5, 2014. 2 In October 2014, Mr. Patel has entered into a plea agreement in the criminal case. The 3 agreement includes restitution and criminal penalties. Sentencing is scheduled for February 10, 2015. 4 Given the pending issues with the criminal case, and in order to allow Mr. Patel and the FTC to try and 5 reach a resolution of the civil matter, Mr. Patel and counsel for the FTC believe it is necessary to 6 extend the stay for an additional 120 days. Mr. Patel agrees that, during the pendency of the stay, he 7 will not seek the release of assets frozen pursuant to the preliminary injunction. 8 9 The requested stay is a stay of the entire civil action against all defendants including a stay of the pending motion for default judgment against defendants Broadway Global Master Inc. and In- 10 Arabia Solutions Inc. The stay does not alter the preliminary injunction with asset freeze, which will 11 remain in full effect. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 Dated: December 8, 2014 14 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 15 By /s/ Sarah Schroeder Sarah Schroeder Attorney for Plaintiff FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 16 17 18 Dated: December 8, 2014 ELLIS LAW GROUP, LLP 19 20 By /s/Andrew M. Steinheimer Andrew M. Steinheimer Attorney for Defendant KIRIT PATEL 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: 12/8/2014 25 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 26 27 28 -2______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO EXTEND STAY; AND PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?