Federal National Mortgage Association v. Lozano et al
Filing
6
ORDER adopting 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/28/12: 3 Motion to Remand is granted. CASE REMANDED to Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin. Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees and costs is denied. The Clerk of Court shall close this file and vacate all dates. Copy of remand order sent. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION,
11
Plaintiff,
No. CIV-S-12-0877-JAM-KJN-PS
12
vs.
13
JUAN LOZANO, et al.,
14
15
Defendants.
__________________________________/
16
ORDER
On June 27, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
17
were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
18
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
19
Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
20
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
21
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
22
1983).
23
24
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
25
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
26
1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 27, 2012, are ADOPTED;
1
1
2
2. Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt No. 3) is granted and this matter is remanded to the
Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin;
3
3. Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees and costs is denied; and
4
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this file and vacate all dates.
5
DATED: August 28, 2012
6
/s/ John A. Mendez
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?