Brazier v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/24/13 ordering that plaintiff is gratned 30 days to submit an amended complaint alleging, or attempting to allege, a due process claim against defendant Miramentes regarding the removal of funds from plaintiff's trust account. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY BRAZIER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-0883 CKD P
v.
ORDER
CDCR, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, who seeks relief
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 27, 2012, the court dismissed with prejudice
19
plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff appealed
20
the judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On June 14, 2013, the
21
Ninth Circuit vacated the judgment in part, remanding this action “for the sole purpose of
22
allowing Brazier to amend his due process claim against defendant Miramentes to allege that
23
Brazier did, in fact, have an ownership interest in the tax refunds credited to his inmate trust
24
account, absent which Brazier’s claim must fail.” (ECF No. 27, citing Neal v. Shimoda, 131 F.
25
3d 818, 827 (9th Cir. 1997).) The Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of all other defendants. (Id.)
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty days to submit an
26
27
amended complaint alleging, or attempting to allege, a due process claim against defendant
28
////
1
1
Miramentes regarding the removal of funds from plaintiff’s inmate trust account. Plaintiff’s
2
failure to submit an amended complaint will result in dismissal of this action.
3
Dated: June 24, 2013
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
braz0883.remand
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?