Leonard v. Denny, et al
Filing
209
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/2/2020 ADOPTING 206 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING the Doe defendant; and GRANTING 164 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID G. LEONARD,
12
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-00915-TLN-AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JIM DENNY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On August 26, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 206.) Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 26, 2020, are ADOPTED IN FULL;
28
2. The Doe defendant is DISMISSED;
1
1
3. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 164) is GRANTED;
2
4. Judgment is entered for Defendants Denny, Parker, Bidwell, Sanders, Brown, Sutter
3
County Jail, Sutter County Sheriff, and Sutter County.
4
DATED: October 2, 2020
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?