Leonard v. Denny, et al
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/17/14 ORDERING that plaintiffs requests for blank subpoena duces tecum forms (ECF Nos. 49 , 52 , 59 ) are DENIED without prejudice based on plaintiffs lack of specificity as well as the fact that the requests are premature.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID G. LEONARD,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-00915-TLN-AC-P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JIM DENNY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court are plaintiff’s seriatim
19
requests for blank subpoena duces tecum forms. ECF Nos. 49, 52, 59. His cursory motions cite
20
to Rule 45(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure without any explanation as to what
21
documents he seeks and from what non-party he seeks them from. Id. In fact, it is not even clear
22
to the court how many blank subpoena duces tecum forms plaintiff is requesting. Compare ECF
23
No. 59 (requesting five forms) with ECF No. 49 (requesting eight forms).
24
A review of this court’s docket indicates that such a request is premature. Plaintiff has
25
filed a first amended civil rights complaint which the court has yet to screen. See ECF No. 58.
26
Therefore, it has not yet been determined who are proper parties to this action. Moreover, since
27
defendants have not filed an answer to his civil rights complaint, no discovery and scheduling
28
order has been entered by the court setting the deadlines by which discovery shall proceed. To
1
1
the extent that plaintiff may be seeking to obtain records from named parties to this civil action,
2
he is advised that such a request may be pursued once discovery commences pursuant to Rule 34
3
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Contardo v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith,
4
119 F.R.D. 622, 624 (D. Mass. 1988) (for purposes of discovery, Rule 34 is directed at parties
5
and Rule 45 is directed at non-parties); Swartout v. LaNore, P.A., 2009 WL 1770540 (W.D.
6
Mich. 2009) (same); 9A Wright and Miller: Federal Practice and Procedure section 2452 (1995)
7
(stating that “Rule 45 has a close relation to the proper functioning of the discovery rules. Most
8
notably, a subpoena is necessary to compel someone who is not a party to appear for the taking of
9
the deposition.”). A person not a party to any civil action may be compelled to produce
10
documents and things or to submit to an inspection as provided in Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of
11
Civil Procedure.
12
Should plaintiff choose to renew his request for blank subpoena forms, he is advised that
13
the request must be specific enough to determine what plaintiff seeks. The request cannot be a
14
broadly stated request that amounts to a fishing expedition. Furthermore, he will be responsible
15
for serving the subpoena(s) through the United States Marshall Service and paying any cost
16
associated therewith, coordinating the production of the documents, and paying any copying costs
17
that might apply.
18
Additionally, plaintiff is advised against filing seriatim and repetitious motions without
19
first providing the court an opportunity to rule. An absence of a response to a pending motion
20
from the court should not be interpreted as an invitation to file repetitious motions. The absence
21
of a prompt response from the court is merely indicative of this court’s over-burdened docket.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s requests for blank subpoena
23
duces tecum forms (ECF Nos. 49, 52, 59) are denied without prejudice based on plaintiff’s lack of
24
specificity as well as the fact that the requests are premature.
25
DATED: March 17, 2014
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?