Leonard v. Denny, et al

Filing 86

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/13/16 ordering plaintiffs motion to quash 81 is denied as moot. Plaintiffs request for blank subpoena forms 81 is granted. The Clerk ofthe Court shall send plaintiff fourteen signed but other wise blank civil subpoena forms. Plaintiffs request for extension of time 83 is granted and the deadlines in the discovery and scheduling order are extended as follows: The parties may conduct discovery until September 26, 2016. Any motions necess ary to compel discovery shall be filed by September 26, 2016. All requests for discovery pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 31(deposition by written question), 33 (interrogatories), 34 (production of documents), and 36(admissions) shall be served no later than July 27, 2016. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before December 19, 2016. Plaintiffs request for leave to serve additional interrogatories 85 is granted. Plaintiff may serve defendants Denney, Parker, and Bidwell with an additional seven interrogatories each and defendant Brown with an additional ten interrogatories. (Plummer, M) Modified on 7/14/2016 (Plummer, M).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID G. LEONARD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-0915 TLN AC P v. ORDER JIM DENNY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former county and current state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this action. Currently before the court are plaintiff’s motion to quash (ECF No. 81), 19 motion for an extension of time to complete discovery (ECF No. 83), and motion for leave to 20 serve additional interrogatories (ECF No. 85). 21 22 I. Motion to Quash Plaintiff seeks to quash defendants’ subpoena which was served on a nonparty for the 23 purpose of obtaining plaintiff’s medical records. ECF No. 81. Defendants respond that the 24 subpoena has since been withdrawn. ECF No. 82. Since the subpoena plaintiff seeks to quash 25 has been withdrawn, the motion will be denied as moot. 26 Included with plaintiff’s motion to quash is a request for fourteen signed, but otherwise 27 blank, subpoena forms. ECF No. 81-1. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(3) requires that 28 1 1 “[t]he clerk must issue a subpoena, signed but otherwise in blank, to a party who requests it.” 2 Therefore, plaintiff’s request will be granted and the Clerk of the Court will be directed to send 3 plaintiff fourteen blank subpoena forms. 4 Plaintiff is advised that if he moves to have the United States Marshal serve the 5 subpoenas, limitations on a subpoena include the relevance of the information sought as well as 6 the burden and expense to the non-party in providing the requested information. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 26, 45. Because Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(b) requires personal service of a subpoena, 8 “[d]irecting the Marshal’s Office to expend its resources personally serving a subpoena is not 9 taken lightly by the court.” Austin v. Winett, 1:04-cv-05104-DLB PC, 2008 WL 5213414, *1 10 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2008); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). 11 In order for the court to consider ordering the United States Marshal to serve the 12 subpoenas, plaintiff must submit to the court the completed subpoena forms and any requisite 13 fees. Any subpoena for documents must describe the items to be produced with reasonable 14 particularity and designate a reasonable time, place, and manner for production. The subpoenas 15 must also be accompanied by a motion to have the United States Marshal serve the subpoenas and 16 the motion must also show that plaintiff has not and cannot obtain the testimony or documents he 17 seeks by way of discovery propounded upon defendants. Failure to do so will result in denial of 18 any motion to have the United States Marshal serve the subpoenas. 19 II. 20 Motion for Extension Plaintiff seeks a thirty day extension of the time to serve discovery requests. ECF No. 83. 21 The current deadline for serving discovery requests is August 26, 2016. ECF No. 80 at 5. 22 Defendants have responded and stipulate to an extension of the time for serving discovery 23 requests and for conducting discovery. ECF No. 84. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request 24 will be granted and the discovery deadlines will be extended by thirty days. The dispositive 25 motion deadline will also be extended accordingly. 26 III. Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories 27 Plaintiff also seeks leave to serve an additional seven interrogatories on defendants 28 Denney, Parker, and Bidwell and an additional ten interrogatories on defendant Brown. ECF No. 2 1 85. Given the limitations on plaintiff’s ability to conduct depositions and the limited number of 2 additional interrogatories plaintiff seeks to serve, the request will be granted. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Plaintiff’s motion to quash (ECF No. 81) is denied as moot. 5 2. Plaintiff’s request for blank subpoena forms (ECF No. 81-1) is granted. The Clerk of 6 the Court shall send plaintiff fourteen signed but otherwise blank civil subpoena forms. 7 3. Plaintiff’s request for extension of time (ECF No. 83) is granted and the deadlines in 8 the discovery and scheduling order are extended as follows: The parties may conduct discovery 9 until September 26, 2016. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by 10 September 26, 2016. All requests for discovery pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 31 11 (deposition by written question), 33 (interrogatories), 34 (production of documents), and 36 12 (admissions) shall be served no later than July 27, 2016. All pretrial motions, except motions to 13 compel discovery, shall be filed on or before December 19, 2016. 14 4. Plaintiff’s request for leave to serve additional interrogatories (ECF No. 85) is granted. 15 Plaintiff may serve defendants Denney, Parker, and Bidwell with an additional seven 16 interrogatories each and defendant Brown with an additional ten interrogatories. 17 DATED: July 13, 2016 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?