Brown v. Brown

Filing 18

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/6/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DEXTER BROWN,

11
12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,

No. 2:12-cv-0934 KJM KJN P

vs.
EDMUND G. BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

By order filed June 6, 2012, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

17

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. On

18

September 7, 2012, in an abundance of caution, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in

19

which to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff

20

has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

24

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

25

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

26

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
1

1

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

3

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

DATED: October 16, 2012

5
6

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8

brow0934.fta2

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2