Grimes v. Mule Creek State Prison Health Care et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/22/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for an Extension of time 69 is GRANTED; and Plaintiff shall place his opposition in the mail on or before 7/1/2015. Defendants shall file and serve a reply, if any, in accordance with Local Rule 230(l).(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL JAMES GRIMES, 12 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-0937 DAD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICHARD RIVERMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendants’ 18 motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 69) is granted; and 20 2. Plaintiff shall place his opposition in the mail on or before July 1, 2015. Defendants 21 shall file and serve a reply, if any, in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). 22 Dated: May 22, 2015 23 24 25 26 27 28 /mp grim0937.36opp

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?