Meyers v. Warden of Centinela State Prison
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/30/2012, ORDERING that, within 30 days, petitioner shall file an opposition, if any, to 13 motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
AARON MEYERS,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. 2:12-cv-0958 GEB JFM P
vs.
WARDEN OF CENTINELA STATE
PRISON,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas
17
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 6, 2012, respondents filed a motion to dismiss the
18
petition on the ground that petitioner has not exhausted state court remedies for three of the four
19
claims contained therein. Petitioner has not opposed the motion.
20
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
21
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
22
the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local
23
Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or
24
within the inherent power of the Court.”
25
/////
26
/////
1
1
Petitioner is hereby informed that failure to file either an opposition to the motion
2
or a statement of non-opposition may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed
3
for lack of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
4
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days
5
of the date of this order, petitioner shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss
6
or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of
7
this action without prejudice pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
8
DATED: July 30, 2012.
9
10
11
12
13
12
meye0958.46osc
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?