Kalani v. Wiebe et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/22/2013 ORDERING the answer 28 is hereby STRICKEN; DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Kalani 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) No. 2:12-cv-00959-LKK-DAD ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ROBERT KALANI, Plaintiff, vs. LEONE B. WIEBE, TRUSTEE OF THE LEONE B. WIEBE FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 13, 1990; HOLLYWOOD CAFÉ LODI, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION dba HOLLYWOOD FAMILY CAFÉ, Defendants. 19 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Robert Kalani and Defendant 22 Leone B. Wiebe, Trustee of the Leone B. Wiebe Family Trust Dated June 13, 1990, the parties 23 who have properly appeared in this action, by and through their respective counsel, that 24 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be 25 dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 26 Date: April 22, 2013 27 28 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. /s/Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Robert Kalani Kalani v. Wiebe, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order Page 1 1 Date: April 16, 2013 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 2 3 /s/ Elizabeth B. Stallard Elizabeth B. Stallard Attorneys for Defendant Leone B. Wiebe, Trustee of the Leone B. Wiebe Family Trust Dated June 13, 1990 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER 9 10 11 1. The Answer of “Hollywood Café Lodi, a California Corporation dba 12 Hollywood Family Café,” was submitted by Darlene Machado, who identifies herself as 13 “Defendant In Pro Per.” It appearing that Ms. Machado is not an attorney, she may not make 14 an appearance on behalf of defendant, nor file an Answer on its behalf. E.D. Cal. R. 183(a) 15 (“A corporation or other entity may appear only by an attorney”); C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. 16 U.S., 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987) (non-attorney “has no authority to appear as an 17 attorney for others than himself”). Accordingly, the Answer (ECF No. 28), is hereby stricken, 18 and defendant is deemed not to have made an appearance in this action. 19 2. The only other defendant, “Leone B. Wiebe, Trustee of the Leone B. Wiebe 20 Family Trust Dated June 13, 19990,” appearing by counsel, has stipulated with plaintiff to the 21 dismissal of this action with prejudice in its entirety, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ 22 fees and costs. ECF No. 34. 23 Accordingly, the remaining parties having so stipulated, 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: April 22, 2013 28 Kalani v. Wiebe, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?