California Sportfishing Protections Alliance v. The Scotts Company, LLC

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 7/16/2012 CONTINUING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference to 10/15/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr., Joint Status Report due 14 days prior to the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; ORDERING Plaintiff to file, by 8/13/2012, a proof of service or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)s prescribed service period. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 THE SCOTTS COMPANY LLC, a corporation, 15 Defendant. ________________________________ 16 2:12-cv-00973-GEB-DAD ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE 17 Plaintiff’s Status Report filed July 5, 2012, reveals this 18 case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial 19 Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on July 23, 2012, is 20 continued to October 15, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall 21 be 22 Conference. filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status 23 Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant with process 25 within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may result in the 26 action being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before August 13, 27 2012, Plaintiff shall file proof of service or a sufficient explanation 28 1 1 why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service 2 period. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 16, 2012 5 6 7 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?