California Sportfishing Protections Alliance v. The Scotts Company, LLC
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 7/16/2012 CONTINUING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference to 10/15/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr., Joint Status Report due 14 days prior to the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; ORDERING Plaintiff to file, by 8/13/2012, a proof of service or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)s prescribed service period. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a
non-profit corporation,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
THE SCOTTS COMPANY LLC, a
corporation,
15
Defendant.
________________________________
16
2:12-cv-00973-GEB-DAD
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P.
4(M) NOTICE
17
Plaintiff’s Status Report filed July 5, 2012, reveals this
18
case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial
19
Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on July 23, 2012, is
20
continued to October 15, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall
21
be
22
Conference.
filed
no
later
than
fourteen
(14)
days
prior
to
the
Status
23
Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal
24
Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant with process
25
within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may result in the
26
action being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before August 13,
27
2012, Plaintiff shall file proof of service or a sufficient explanation
28
1
1
why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service
2
period.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 16, 2012
5
6
7
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?