Broussard v. Higgins

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/19/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 13 motion for default against the defendants. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LOUIS J. BROUSSARD, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER K. HIGGINS, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 No. 2:12-CV-0984-CMK-P / Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for entry of default (Doc. 13). Plaintiff is requesting the court to enter the default against the defendants 20 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, alleging the defendants failed to answer or 21 otherwise defend in this matter. 22 A defendant is not in “default” unless he “has failed to plead or otherwise defend, 23 and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise.” Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 55(a). A party generally 24 has 20 after being served with the summons and complaint to file a responsive pleading. See 25 Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a). However, if the party has timely waived service under Rule 4(d), a 26 responsive pleading is timely if filed within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent. See 1 1 id. A review of the docket in this case shows that the court ordered the United States Marshal to 2 serve the complaint on defendants on July 19, 2012. No return of service has been filed with the 3 court showing when or if any of the defendants have been served. As such, no default can be 4 entered against the defendants for failure to defend. 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for default against the defendants (Doc. 13) is denied. 7 8 9 10 DATED: October 19, 2012 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?