Broussard v. Higgins
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/19/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 13 motion for default against the defendants. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LOUIS J. BROUSSARD,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
K. HIGGINS,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
No. 2:12-CV-0984-CMK-P
/
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for entry of default (Doc. 13).
Plaintiff is requesting the court to enter the default against the defendants
20
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, alleging the defendants failed to answer or
21
otherwise defend in this matter.
22
A defendant is not in “default” unless he “has failed to plead or otherwise defend,
23
and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise.” Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 55(a). A party generally
24
has 20 after being served with the summons and complaint to file a responsive pleading. See
25
Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a). However, if the party has timely waived service under Rule 4(d), a
26
responsive pleading is timely if filed within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent. See
1
1
id. A review of the docket in this case shows that the court ordered the United States Marshal to
2
serve the complaint on defendants on July 19, 2012. No return of service has been filed with the
3
court showing when or if any of the defendants have been served. As such, no default can be
4
entered against the defendants for failure to defend.
5
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for default
against the defendants (Doc. 13) is denied.
7
8
9
10
DATED: October 19, 2012
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?