Lewis et al v. Gardiner, et al
Filing
11
ORDER adopting 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/28/12: The request for permissive joinder of plaintiffs and for class certification is denied. Plaintiffs Ken A Marchesin and Robert Mistriel dismissed. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DAVID K. LEWIS, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
No. 2:12-cv-0986 JAM EFB P
vs.
GARDINER, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff David Lewis, Ken Marchesin, and Robert Mistriel, state prisoners
17
proceeding pro se, have filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The
18
matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and
19
Local Rule 302.
20
On June 19, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
21
herein which were served on the plaintiffs and which contained notice to the plaintiffs that any
22
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No
23
objections have been filed.1
24
////
25
1
26
The file reflects that plaintiff Lewis’s copy of the findings and recommendations were
returned by the Postal Service marked “Undeliverable, Deceased.”
1
1
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
3
ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 19, 2012, are adopted in full;
5
2. The request for permissive joinder of plaintiffs and for class certification is
6
7
8
9
10
denied; and
3. Plaintiffs Ken Marchesin and Robert Mistriel are dismissed from this action.
DATED: August 28, 2012
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?