Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc. et al
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 7/23/2012 ORDERING that the Defendant Paladin Brands Group, Inc.'s response to the Complaint is due on 7/30/2012. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
SEDGWICK LLP
Robert M. Harkins, Jr. (State Bar No. 179525)
Matthew A. Fischer (State Bar No. 191451)
Jennifer Ming (State Bar No. 260367)
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104-2834
Telephone:
415.781.7900
Facsimile:
415.781.2635
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
PALADIN BRANDS GROUP, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC., PALADIN
BRANDS GROUP, INC., and JEWELL
ATTACHMENTS, LLC,
15
Defendants.
16
) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01004-GEB-DAD
)
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
) SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF/2856978v1
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01004-GEB-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
1
Defendant Paladin Brands Group, Inc. (“Paladin”) was served with the Complaint on
2
June 25, 2012. Its response to the Complaint was due on July 16, 2012, but that date was
3
subsequently extended until July 23, 2012. Paladin and Plaintiff Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC
4
continue to be in discussions that may impact Paladin’s response to the Complaint, and the
5
parties agree that it would be useful to have an additional week before a response is due. As a
6
result, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to a one-week extension for Paladin to respond to
7
the Complaint, so that Paladin’s response is due on July 30, 2012. This is the second such
8
extension.
9
DATED: July 23, 2012
10
SEDGWICK LLP
By: /s/ _______________
Robert Harkins
11
Attorneys for Defendant JEWELL
ATTACHMENTS, LLC
12
13
14
DATED: July 23, 2012
15
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By: /s/ _________________
Casey J. McCracken
Attorneys for Plaintiff ADVANCED STEEL
RECOVERY, LLC
16
17
ORDER
18
19
Pursuant to this Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED that the Defendant Paladin Brands Group, Inc.’s response to the Complaint is due on
21
July 30, 2012.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Date: 7/23/2012
24
___________________________________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
25
26
DEAC_Signature-END:
27
28
SF/2856978v1
61khh4bb
1
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01004-GEB-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?