Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc. et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 7/23/2012 ORDERING that the Defendant Paladin Brands Group, Inc.'s response to the Complaint is due on 7/30/2012. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4

SEDGWICK LLP
Robert M. Harkins, Jr. (State Bar No. 179525)
Matthew A. Fischer (State Bar No. 191451)
Jennifer Ming (State Bar No. 260367)
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104-2834
Telephone:
415.781.7900
Facsimile:
415.781.2635

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
PALADIN BRANDS GROUP, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

14

X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC., PALADIN
BRANDS GROUP, INC., and JEWELL
ATTACHMENTS, LLC,

15

Defendants.

16

) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01004-GEB-DAD
)
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
) SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF/2856978v1

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01004-GEB-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME

1

Defendant Paladin Brands Group, Inc. (“Paladin”) was served with the Complaint on

2

June 25, 2012. Its response to the Complaint was due on July 16, 2012, but that date was

3

subsequently extended until July 23, 2012. Paladin and Plaintiff Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC

4

continue to be in discussions that may impact Paladin’s response to the Complaint, and the

5

parties agree that it would be useful to have an additional week before a response is due. As a

6

result, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to a one-week extension for Paladin to respond to

7

the Complaint, so that Paladin’s response is due on July 30, 2012. This is the second such

8

extension.

9

DATED: July 23, 2012

10

SEDGWICK LLP
By: /s/ _______________
Robert Harkins

11

Attorneys for Defendant JEWELL
ATTACHMENTS, LLC

12
13
14

DATED: July 23, 2012

15

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By: /s/ _________________
Casey J. McCracken
Attorneys for Plaintiff ADVANCED STEEL
RECOVERY, LLC

16
17

ORDER
18
19

Pursuant to this Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

20

ORDERED that the Defendant Paladin Brands Group, Inc.’s response to the Complaint is due on

21

July 30, 2012.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Date: 7/23/2012

24

___________________________________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge

25
26
DEAC_Signature-END:

27
28
SF/2856978v1

61khh4bb
1

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01004-GEB-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME