Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc. et al
Filing
95
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/29/15 DENYING 73 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
No. 2:12-cv-01004-GEB-DAD
v.
X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC. and
JEWELL ATTACHMENTS, LLC,
ORDER DENYING ATTORNEY’S FEES
MOTION
Defendants.
12
13
14
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
15
16
Defendants and Counterclaimants X-Body Equipment, Inc.
17
and Jewell Attachments, LLC move for an award of attorney’s fees
18
and costs under 35 U.S.C. § 285. (Mot. for Att’y Fees, ECF No.
19
87.) This statute prescribes that “[t]he court in exceptional
20
cases
21
party.”
22
may
award
reasonable
attorney
fees
to
the
prevailing
27
[A]n “exceptional” case is . . . one that
stands out from others with respect to the
substantive strength of a party’s litigating
position (considering both the governing law
and
the
facts
of
the
case)
or
the
unreasonable manner in which the case was
litigated. District courts may determine
whether a case is “exceptional” in the caseby-case
exercise
of
their
discretion,
considering
the
totality
of
the
circumstances.
28
Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. Ct.
23
24
25
26
1
1
1749, 1756 (2014).
2
The moving parties have not satisfied this standard;
3
therefore, the motion is denied.
4
Dated:
January 29, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?