Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc. et al

Filing 95

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/29/15 DENYING 73 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 11 No. 2:12-cv-01004-GEB-DAD v. X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC. and JEWELL ATTACHMENTS, LLC, ORDER DENYING ATTORNEY’S FEES MOTION Defendants. 12 13 14 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 15 16 Defendants and Counterclaimants X-Body Equipment, Inc. 17 and Jewell Attachments, LLC move for an award of attorney’s fees 18 and costs under 35 U.S.C. § 285. (Mot. for Att’y Fees, ECF No. 19 87.) This statute prescribes that “[t]he court in exceptional 20 cases 21 party.” 22 may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing 27 [A]n “exceptional” case is . . . one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. District courts may determine whether a case is “exceptional” in the caseby-case exercise of their discretion, considering the totality of the circumstances. 28 Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 23 24 25 26 1 1 1749, 1756 (2014). 2 The moving parties have not satisfied this standard; 3 therefore, the motion is denied. 4 Dated: January 29, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?