Raybon v. Totten et al
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/15/14 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 8/6/14 39 are ADOPTED in full; and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants on 2/26/14 34 is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim against Totten and Hardy but DENIED as to Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Hardy.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GOLDY RAYBON,
12
No. 2:12-cv-1008-GEB-EFB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
TOTTEN, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 6, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 6, 2014, are adopted in full; and
27
28
/////
1
1
2. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants on February 26, 2014 (ECF No.
2
34) is granted as to plaintiff’s conditions of confinement claim against Totten and Hardy but
3
denied as to plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Hardy.
4
Dated: September 15, 2014
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?