Johnson v. Ruff

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/8/12. Defendant is granted an extension until 6/29/12 to respond to the complaint. (Manzer, C)

4

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
E-MAIL [e-mail]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson

6

CRIS C. VAUGHAN, ESQ., SBN 99568
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800
Loomis, CA 95650
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 916-660-9378

1
2
3

7
8
9
10

Attorney for Defendant, Richard H. Ruff

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Scott N. Johnson

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
Richard H. Ruff,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )

Case No.2:12-cv-01019-GEB-CKD
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF
TIME UNTIL JUNE 29, 2012 FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

20
21

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N.

22

Johnson

23

follows:

24
25

and

Defendant,

1. No

extension

Richard

of

H.

time

Ruff,

has

stipulate

been

obtained.

26
27
28

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

as

previously

2. Defendant is granted an extension until June

1
2

29,

3

Plaintiff’s complaint.

4

2012

to

respond

or

otherwise

plead

to

3. Defendant’s response will be due no later than

5

June 29, 2012.

6
7

IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of June 7, 2012.

8
9

Dated:

June 7, 2012

_/s/ Cris C. Vaughan__
Cris C. Vaughan,
Attorney for Defendant,
Carapanos Properties,
LLC

Dated:

June 7, 2012

_/s/ Scott N. Johnson________
Scott N. Johnson,
Attorney for Plaintiff

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

[PROPOSED] ORDER

18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:

6/8/2012

21
22

_________________________

23

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District

24

Judge
DEAC_Signature-END:

25
26

61khh4bb

27
28

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2