Johnson v. Ruff
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/8/12. Defendant is granted an extension until 6/29/12 to respond to the complaint. (Manzer, C)
4
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516
FAX (916) 481-4224
E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net
5
Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
6
CRIS C. VAUGHAN, ESQ., SBN 99568
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800
Loomis, CA 95650
Telephone: 916-660-9401
Facsimile: 916-660-9378
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
Attorney for Defendant, Richard H. Ruff
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Scott N. Johnson
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
Richard H. Ruff,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )
Case No.2:12-cv-01019-GEB-CKD
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF
TIME UNTIL JUNE 29, 2012 FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
20
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N.
22
Johnson
23
follows:
24
25
and
Defendant,
1. No
extension
Richard
of
H.
time
Ruff,
has
stipulate
been
obtained.
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
as
previously
2. Defendant is granted an extension until June
1
2
29,
3
Plaintiff’s complaint.
4
2012
to
respond
or
otherwise
plead
to
3. Defendant’s response will be due no later than
5
June 29, 2012.
6
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of June 7, 2012.
8
9
Dated:
June 7, 2012
_/s/ Cris C. Vaughan__
Cris C. Vaughan,
Attorney for Defendant,
Carapanos Properties,
LLC
Dated:
June 7, 2012
_/s/ Scott N. Johnson________
Scott N. Johnson,
Attorney for Plaintiff
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
6/8/2012
21
22
_________________________
23
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District
24
Judge
DEAC_Signature-END:
25
26
61khh4bb
27
28
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?