Johnson v. Ruff

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/8/12. Defendant is granted an extension until 6/29/12 to respond to the complaint. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
4 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson 6 CRIS C. VAUGHAN, ESQ., SBN 99568 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES 6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800 Loomis, CA 95650 Telephone: 916-660-9401 Facsimile: 916-660-9378 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 Attorney for Defendant, Richard H. Ruff 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Scott N. Johnson ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) Richard H. Ruff, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) Case No.2:12-cv-01019-GEB-CKD STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL JUNE 29, 2012 FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N. 22 Johnson 23 follows: 24 25 and Defendant, 1. No extension Richard of H. time Ruff, has stipulate been obtained. 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 as previously 2. Defendant is granted an extension until June 1 2 29, 3 Plaintiff’s complaint. 4 2012 to respond or otherwise plead to 3. Defendant’s response will be due no later than 5 June 29, 2012. 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of June 7, 2012. 8 9 Dated: June 7, 2012 _/s/ Cris C. Vaughan__ Cris C. Vaughan, Attorney for Defendant, Carapanos Properties, LLC Dated: June 7, 2012 _/s/ Scott N. Johnson________ Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 6/8/2012 21 22 _________________________ 23 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District 24 Judge DEAC_Signature-END: 25 26 61khh4bb 27 28 STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?