Hardy v. McLaughlin et al

Filing 15

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/20/12 ORDERING that all non-expert discovery shall be completed by 5/30/2013 and all expert discovery shall be completed by 7/30/2013. Motions to compel non-expert discovery must be heard not later than 4/24/2013 and motions to compel expert discovery must be heard not later than 6/26/2013. The parties shall make their expert disclosures on or before 6/30/2013. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel d iscovery, shall be completed on or before 9/25/2013. Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 12/18/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Jury Trial is SET for 3/11/2014 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

BLAIN A. HARDY, JR.,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,

No. 2:12-cv-1026-EFB

vs.
MICHAEL RANDALL MCLAUGHLIN;
OLD DURHAM WOOD, INC.,

14

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
Defendants.
/

15
16

This case is before the undersigned pursuant to the consent of the parties. See Dckt. Nos.

17

10, 11; see also E.D. Cal. L.R. 305; 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On September 19, 2012, the case was

18

before the undersigned for a status (pretrial scheduling) conference. Attorney Joseph Maloney

19

appeared on behalf of plaintiff and attorney Andrew Morrissey appeared on behalf of defendants.

20

After hearing, and pursuant to the parties’ joint status report, Dckt. No. 13, the court enters the

21

following scheduling order:

22

SERVICE OF PROCESS

23
24
25
26

Service of process is undisputed and defendants have answered.
JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted except with leave
of court, good cause having been shown.
1

1
2

JURISDICTION/VENUE
Plaintiff contends that this court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 in that plaintiff’s

3

claims arise under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 and § 2000e-3 (Title VII). Plaintiff also contends the

4

court has supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Defendants question jurisdiction

5

and contend that they may file a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Venue

6

is not disputed.

7

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULES

8

All law and motion, except as to discovery, shall be completed by September 25, 2013.

9

The word “completed” in this context means that all law and motion matters must be heard by

10

the above date. Counsel (and/or pro se parties)1 are cautioned to refer to the Local Rules

11

regarding the requirements for noticing such motions on the court’s regularly scheduled law and

12

motion calendar. This paragraph does not preclude motions for continuances, temporary

13

restraining orders or other emergency applications, and is subject to any special scheduling set

14

forth in the “MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS” paragraph below.

15

The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and

16

refine the legal issues raised by the case, and to dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that

17

are susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties need to

18

identify and fully research the issues presented by the case, and then examine those issues in

19

light of the evidence gleaned through discovery. If it appears to counsel after examining the

20

legal issues and facts that an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, counsel are to file the

21

appropriate motion by the law and motion cutoff set forth above.

22

ALL PURELY LEGAL ISSUES ARE TO BE RESOLVED BY TIMELY PRETRIAL

23

MOTION. Counsel are reminded that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to

24

address the admissibility of evidence. COUNSEL ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE COURT

25
26

1

Any reference to “counsel” in this order includes parties appearing in propria persona.
2

1

WILL LOOK WITH DISFAVOR UPON SUBSTANTIVE MOTIONS PRESENTED IN THE

2

GUISE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AT THE TIME OF TRIAL.

3

DISCOVERY

4

All non-expert discovery shall be completed by May 30, 2013 and all expert discovery

5

shall be completed by July 30, 2013. The word “completed” means that all discovery shall have

6

been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery

7

shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been

8

ordered, the order has been complied with. Motions to compel non-expert discovery must be

9

noticed on the undersigned’s calendar in accordance with the Local Rules and must be heard not

10

later than April 24, 2013 and motions to compel expert discovery must be heard not later than

11

June 26, 2013.

12

EXPERT DISCLOSURE

13
14
15

On or before June 30, 2013, the parties are to designate in writing, and serve upon all
other parties, the names of all experts they propose to tender at trial.
An expert witness not appearing on said lists will not be permitted to testify unless the

16

party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity of the witness could not have been

17

reasonably anticipated at the time the lists were exchanged; (b) the court and opposing counsel

18

were promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly

19

proffered for deposition. Failure to provide the information required along with the expert

20

designation may lead to preclusion of the expert’s testimony or other appropriate sanctions.

21

For the purposes of this scheduling order, experts are defined as “percipient” and “Rule

22

26” experts. Both types of experts shall be listed. Percipient experts are persons who, because

23

of their expertise, have rendered expert opinions in the normal course of their work duties or

24

observations pertinent to the issues in the case. Another term for their opinions are “historical

25

opinions.” Percipient experts are experts who, unless also designated as Rule 26 experts, are

26

limited to testifying to their historical opinions and the reasons for them. That is, they may be
3

1

asked to testify about their opinions given in the past and the whys and wherefores concerning

2

the development of those opinions. However, they may not be asked to render a current opinion

3

for the purposes of the litigation.

4

Rule 26 experts, who may be percipient experts as well, shall be specifically designated

5

by a party to be a testifying expert for the purposes of the litigation.2 The Rule 26 expert may

6

express opinions formed for the purposes of the litigation. A party designating a Rule 26 expert

7

will be assumed to have acquired the express permission of the witness to be so listed.

8

The parties shall comply with the information disclosure provisions of Federal Rule of

9

Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) for any expert, who is in whole or in part designated as a Rule 26

10

expert. This information is due at the time of designation. Failure to supply the required

11

information may result in the Rule 26 expert being stricken. All Rule 26 experts are to be fully

12

prepared to render an informed opinion at the time of designation so that they may fully

13

participate in any deposition taken by the opposing party. Rule 26 experts will not be permitted

14

to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, which should

15

have been reasonably available at the time of designation. The court will closely scrutinize for

16

discovery abuse deposition opinions which differ markedly in nature and/or in bases from those

17

expressed in the mandatory information disclosure.

18

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

19

The final pretrial conference is set before the undersigned on December 18, 2013 at 10:00

20

a.m. in Courtroom No. 24. Counsel are cautioned that counsel appearing for pretrial will in fact

21

try the matter. Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the pretrial

22

conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for

23

oral testimony. Counsel are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to pretrial statements

24

and conferences. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES 281 AND 282 WILL BE

25
26

2

The court is not interested in a designation of non-testifying Rule 26 experts.
4

1

GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS.

2

Notwithstanding Local Rule 281, the parties shall submit a joint pretrial statement not

3

later than fourteen (14) days prior to the pretrial conference. The joint pretrial statement shall

4

conform with the requirements of Local Rule 281(b). The undisputed facts and disputed factual

5

issues shall be set forth in two separate sections. The parties should identify those facts which

6

are relevant to each separate cause of action. In this regard, the parties are to number each

7

individual fact or factual issues. Where the parties are unable to agree as to what factual issues

8

are properly before the court for trial, they should nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED

9

FACTUAL ISSUES” all issues asserted by any of the parties and explain by parenthetical the

10

controversy concerning each issue. The parties should keep in mind that, in general, each fact

11

should relate or correspond to an element of the relevant cause of action. The parties should also

12

keep in mind that the purpose of listing the disputed factual issues is to apprise the court and all

13

parties about the precise issues that will be litigated at trial. The court is not interested in a

14

listing of all evidentiary facts underlying the issues that are in dispute.3 The joint statement of

15

undisputed facts and disputed factual issues is to be filed with the court concurrently with the

16

filing of the joint pretrial statement.

17

Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(10) and (11), the parties are required to provide in their

18

pretrial statement a list of witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter

19

for what purpose. These lists shall not be contained in the pretrial statement itself, but shall be

20

attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the final pretrial order. Plaintiff’s

21

exhibits shall be listed numerically; defendant’s exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. The

22

pretrial order will contain a stringent standard for the proffering of witnesses and exhibits at trial

23

not listed in the pretrial order. Counsel are cautioned that the standard will be strictly applied.

24

On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses which counsel do not intend or use will be

25
3

26

However, with respect to the listing of undisputed facts, the court will accept
agreements as to evidentiary facts.
5

1

viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.

2

Counsel are reminded that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, it will be their

3

duty at the pretrial conference to aid the court in (a) formulation and simplification of issues and

4

the elimination of meritless claims or defenses; (b) settling of facts which should be properly

5

admitted; and (c) avoidance of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. The parties must

6

prepare their joint pretrial statement, and participate in good faith at the pretrial conference, with

7

these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF

8

SANCTIONS which may include monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, eliminations of

9

claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as the court deems appropriate.

10

TRIAL SETTING

11

A jury trial is set to commence before the undersigned on March 11, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. in

12

Courtroom No. 24. The parties anticipate that the trial will take four days.

13

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
A settlement conference will be set at the request of the parties at the time of the Pretrial

14
15

Conference. If the parties conclude that an earlier settlement conference would likely resolve the

16

case, they may contact the clerk to request that one be scheduled.

17

SUMMARY OF ORDER

18

THE COURT SUMMARIZES THE SCHEDULING ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

19

1. All non-expert discovery shall be completed by May 30, 2013 and all expert discovery

20

shall be completed by July 30, 2013. Motions to compel non-expert discovery must be heard not

21

later than April 24, 2013 and motions to compel expert discovery must be heard not later than

22

June 26, 2013.

23

2. The parties shall make their expert disclosures on or before June 30, 2013.

24

3. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed as

25

described herein on or before September 25, 2013.

26

////
6

1

4. The final pretrial conference is set before the undersigned on December 18,

2

2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24. Pretrial statements shall be filed in accordance with

3

Local Rules 281 and 282, and the requirements set forth herein.

4
5
6
7

5. A jury trial is set to commence before the undersigned on March 11, 2014 at
9:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 20, 2012.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
7