Gonzales v. McDonald
Filing
2
ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the SACRAMENTO Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/19/12: New Case Number 2:12-cv-01935 KJN (PC). Old Case Number 1:12-cv-00593 MJS (PC). (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
MARK ANTHONY GONZALES,
1:12-cv-00593 MJS (PC)
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MIKE MCDONALD,
16
17
18
19
Defendant.
/
Plaintiff Mark Anthony Gonzales (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has
filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by Defendants. The alleged
21
violations took place in Lassen County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United
22
States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should
23
have been filed in the Sacramento Division.
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the
25
proper court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore,
26
this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division.
27
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District
-1-
1
of California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall
2
3
be filed at:
4
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
il0i0d
April 19, 2012
Michael J. Seng
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?