Maury v. Martel

Filing 172

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/31/2020 ADOPTING 171 Findings and Recommendations in full and GRANTING 169 Motion to Stay. These proceedings are STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED through 5/30/2020. Petitioner shall file a notice prior to the end of the stay informing the court if he will seek to amend the petition. CASE ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT EDWARD MAURY, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-1043 WBS DB DEATH PENALTY CASE v. RONALD DAVIS, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner under sentence of death proceeding with an application for a 17 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 7, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 7, 2019 (ECF No. 171) are adopted 27 28 in full; 1 1 2. Petitioner’s motion to stay these proceedings (ECF No. 169) is granted; 2 3. These proceedings are stayed and administratively closed through May 30, 2020; and 3 4. Petitioner shall file a notice prior to the end of the stay informing the court if he will 4 seek to amend the petition. 5 Dated: March 31, 2020 6 7 8 9 10 DLB:9/Maury mtn to stay.801 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DLB:9 DB/orders-capital/maury 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?