Maury v. Martel
Filing
193
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/5/2021 ADOPTING 192 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 187 Motion to stay proceedings as follows: Proceedings are STAYED through 3/1/2021 and Petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for the period from 3/11/2020 through 3/1/2021. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT EDWARD MAURY,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-1043 WBS DB
DEATH PENALTY CASE
v.
RONALD DAVIS,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a condemned state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an
17
18
application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to
19
a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 19, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 19, 2020, are adopted in full; and
27
28
////
1
1
2
2. Petitioner’s motion to stay these proceedings and equitably toll the statute of
limitations (ECF No. 187) is granted as follows:
3
a. These proceedings are stayed through March 1, 2021; and
4
b. Petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for the
5
6
period from March 11, 2020 through March 1, 2021.
Dated: January 5, 2021
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
DLB:9/maury.eq toll jo(2)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?