Directi Internet Solutions v. Dhillon, et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/13/13 denying as moot 32 Motion to Compel. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT.
LTD.,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15

No. 2:12-cv-1045 WBS DAD

ORDER

v.
HARRY DHILLON, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
On August 28, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion to compel, seeking an order from this

18
19

court compelling defendant Harry Dhillon’s appearance at a deposition. (Doc. No. 32.) The

20

matter is set for hearing before the undersigned on September 20, 2013. However, on February

21

27, 2013, default judgment was entered against the defendants, defendants were directed to pay

22

plaintiff $101,180 in damages and this action was closed. (Doc. No. 28.)

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 28, 2013 motion

1
2

to compel (Doc. No. 32) is denied as moot.1

3

Dated: September 13, 2013

4
5
6
7
8

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\directi1045.mtc.den.ord.docx

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1

26
27
28

Plaintiff’s motion to compel states that plaintiff seeks to depose Mr. Dhillon in an effort to
gather information to recover the money owed plaintiff pursuant to the February 27, 2013
judgment. In this regard, it appears that plaintiff may wish to hold a judgment debtor
examination. Plaintiff can facilitate the scheduling of a judgment debtor examination by
contacting Pete Buzo, Courtroom Deputy for the undersigned, at 916-930-4128.
2