United States of America v. Real Property Located at 6642 Merchandise Way, Diamond Springs, California, El Dorado County, APN: 329-392-05

Filing 47

FINAL JUDGMENT of FORFEITURE signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/10/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
4 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U. S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 5 Attorneys for the United States 1 2 3 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 2:12-CV-01046-JAM-KJN Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE 13 14 15 16 v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6642 MERCHANDISE WAY, DIAMOND SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, EL DORADO COUNTY, APN: 329-392-05, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, 17 Defendant. 18 19 Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture, the Court finds: 20 1. This is a civil action in rem brought against certain real property located at 6642 21 Merchandise Way, Diamond Springs, California, El Dorado County, APN: 329-392-05, including all 22 appurtenances and improvements thereto (hereafter “defendant property”), and more fully described as: 23 LOT 21, OF PARK WEST SUBDIVISION UNIT NO. 2, FILED OCTOBER 4,1989 IN BOOK G, OF MAPS AT PAGE 140, EL DORADO COUNTY RECORDS. 24 25 2. A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (“Complaint”) was filed on April 19, 2012, 26 alleging that said defendant property is subject to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 27 881 (a)(7). 28 3. On May 25, 2012, the defendant property was posted with a copy of the Complaint and 1 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 Notice of Complaint. 2 4. Beginning on May 19, 2012, for at least thirty consecutive days, the United States 3 published Notice of the Forfeiture Action on the official internet government forfeiture site 4 www.forfeiture.gov. A Declaration of Publication was filed on September 6, 2012. 5 5. In addition to the public notice on the official internet government forfeiture site 6 www.forfeiture.gov, actual notice or attempted notice was given to the following individual(s): 7 a. James Short 8 b. Harold Bollenbacher 9 6. Claimant Harold Bollenbacher, Trustee of The Family Trust Created Under the 10 Bollenbacher Family Trust Dated September 27, 1995, filed a claim to the defendant property on May 11 15, 2012, and an answer to the complaint on October 13, 2016. No other parties have filed claims or 12 answers in this matter, and the time in which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has 13 expired. 14 Based on the above findings, and the files and records of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED 15 AND ADJUDGED: 16 1. The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and 17 between the parties to this action. 18 2. Within sixty (60) days of the entry of Final Judgment of Forfeiture, Claimant Harold 19 Bollenbacher, Trustee of The Family Trust Created Under the Bollenbacher Family Trust Dated 20 September 27, 1995, shall send a cashier’s check for $5,000.00 made payable to the U.S. Marshals 21 Service to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Attn: Asset Forfeiture Unit, 501 I Street, Suite 10-100, 22 Sacramento, CA 95814. All right, title, and interest in said funds shall be substituted for the defendant 23 property located at 6642 Merchandise Way, Diamond Springs, California, El Dorado County, APN: 24 329-392-05 and forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7), to be disposed of 25 according to law. 26 3. Within thirty (30) days of full payment of the settlement amount, the United States shall 27 record a withdrawal of lis pendens against the defendant property. 28 4. If payment in full is not made within the time stipulated above, Claimant Harold 2 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 Bollenbacher, Trustee of The Family Trust Created Under the Bollenbacher Family Trust Dated 2 September 27, 1995, will be deemed to be in default of this stipulation and the U.S. Marshals Service 3 shall be authorized to sell the defendant property, in the most commercially feasible manner, as soon as 4 reasonably possible, for the maximum price. Through the sale of the defendant property, the United 5 States shall receive the net proceeds, less payments for costs of selling the property, cleanup, other 6 expenses incurred, and any legitimate liens that exist on the defendant property. 7 5. The United States and its servants, agents, and employees and all other public entities, 8 their servants, agents, and employees, are released from any and all liability arising out of or in any way 9 connected with the filing of the Complaint and the posting of the defendant properties with the 10 Complaint and Notice of Complaint. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and 11 unanticipated injuries, and/or damages arising out of the filing of the Complaint and the posting of the 12 defendant properties with the Complaint and Notice of Complaint, as well as to those now known or 13 disclosed. Claimants waived the provisions of California Civil Code § 1542. 14 6. All parties are to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. 15 7. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Hon. John A. Mendez, 16 District Judge, shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture. 17 8. Based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint filed April 19, 2012, and the 18 Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court enters this Certificate of Reasonable 19 Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for the seizure and arrest of the 20 defendant currency, and for the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action. 21 22 23 SO ORDERED THIS 10th day of January, 2017 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________ JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 24 25 26 27 28 3 Final Judgment of Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?