Weaver v. Davisson
Filing
6
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/30/2012, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WILLIE WEAVER,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
No. 2:12-cv-1091 WBS DAD P
vs.
ATTORNEY HILARY DAVISSON,
Defendants.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/
16
By an order filed June 1, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis
17
affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to
18
do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff was also granted
19
the same period of time in which to voluntarily dismiss this action. The thirty day period has
20
now expired, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order and has not filed an
21
in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
22
RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
23
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
24
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
25
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
26
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
1
1
Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served
2
within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
3
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
4
Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
DATED: July 30, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10
11
weav1391.fifp
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?